XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.athiesm, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.talk.creationism
From: lunch@nofreelunch.us
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 06:52:11 -0400, old man joe wrote
in alt.talk.creationism:
>On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 04:12:26 -0700 (PDT), Wombat wrote:
>
>>On Apr 29, 12:41 pm, old man joe wrote:
>>> reason # 1. since all mankind came from Adam and Eve and Adam of his own
free will chose rebellion
>>> against God rather than obedience, and because of God's judgment against
him, out of whom all
>>> mankind would be born, all of mankind has Original Sin imputed to their
account Ps. 58:3; Ro.
>>> 3:10-18... simply put, " a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. "
Mt.7:17
>>>
>>> it's in the best interest of the Evolutionists to say that man came from a
monkey in order to avoid
>>> being found in Adam, in whom all die. 1 Cor. 15:22 the death in view here
is the Second Death.
>>>
>>> reason # 2. since the Flood is an integral part of God's judgment against
wicked people, as is
>>> Sodom and Gomorrah, in that He required their life of them that perished
in the Flood of Noah, after
>>> all, life is His possession, not ours, He can not be stopped when He
requires it back...
>>>
>>> therefore the Evolutionists do not want a Global Flood because the Global
Flood is God's actual
>>> punishment against one type of people... the sinner, those in rebellion
against God. God is on
>>> record as once again about to destroy sinner's but this time it will be
the whole universe, after
>>> the Day of Judgment. Mt. 24
>>>
>>> because man is made in the image of God he knows very well which side of
the fence he is on and the
>>> Bible speaks to this when in it God says the wicked are " without excuse "
in His eyes. Ro. 1:18-20
>>>
>>> oh yes, the Evolutionists like to call anyone countering their position
filthy names, and in so
>>> doing profess their Original Sin. they need to feel superior and their
best approach is to make
>>> those whom respect the Living God, sound stupid. yet, not one of them is
able to show how life came
>>> from elements that are not alive which is the starting point of proving
how like evolved out of
>>> non-living elements... the elements comprising their human ( not monkey )
bodies are not alive and
>>> are of the same type as those in a dead person. why then is one person
alive and another dead though
>>> they are comprised of the exact same stuff ? because life comes from the
Living God... He gives it
>>> and He takes it back.
>>>
>>> the Evolutionists, as smart as they think they are, can not concoct a
scheme to explain how every
>>> element in them is not alive though they are physically alive.
>>>
>>> Evolution can not be true since it is not possible to get life out of the
non-living elements of the
>>> earth. Evolution is nothing more than an attack against Jesus Christ
Eternal God who spoke the
>>> universe into being and gave life to the living things we see around us,
and we ourselves as well.
>>>
>>> Evolutionists are nothing more than the anti-Christs spoken of in 1 Jn.
2:18.
>>>
>>> interestingly enough, the secular dictionary defines ' atheist ' as one
who denies or disbelieves in
>>> the existence of God or gods. the Word of God, the Bible, defines an '
atheist ' as one whom God
>>> has passed by for salvation which He alone provides. Eph. 2:12
>>
>>GIGO
>>
>>Wombat
>
>
>just as was said... an Atheist must define himself by his Original Sin.
Show us that original sin exists. You must only use evidence and clear
logic. The Bible cannot be used unless you can establish that it is
reliable and accurate. Stories about Adam and Eve, which are already
known not to be historically correct, cannot be used.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
