XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.athiesm, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.talk.creationism
From: lunch@nofreelunch.us
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 07:05:27 -0400, old man joe wrote
in alt.talk.creationism:
>On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 22:27:54 -0400, raven1
wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 06:41:19 -0400, old man joe
>>wrote:
>>
>>Serious question: do you really believe any of this nonsense? If yes,
>>for what possible sane reason?
>>
>>>reason # 1. since all mankind came from Adam and Eve and Adam of his own
free will chose rebellion
>>>against God rather than obedience, and because of God's judgment against
him, out of whom all
>>>mankind would be born, all of mankind has Original Sin imputed to their
account Ps. 58:3; Ro.
>>>3:10-18... simply put, " a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. "
Mt.7:17
>>>
>>>it's in the best interest of the Evolutionists to say that man came from a
monkey in order to avoid
>>>being found in Adam, in whom all die. 1 Cor. 15:22 the death in view here
is the Second Death.
>>>
>>>reason # 2. since the Flood is an integral part of God's judgment against
wicked people, as is
>>>Sodom and Gomorrah, in that He required their life of them that perished in
the Flood of Noah, after
>>>all, life is His possession, not ours, He can not be stopped when He
requires it back...
>>>
>>>therefore the Evolutionists do not want a Global Flood because the Global
Flood is God's actual
>>>punishment against one type of people... the sinner, those in rebellion
against God. God is on
>>>record as once again about to destroy sinner's but this time it will be the
whole universe, after
>>>the Day of Judgment. Mt. 24
>>>
>>>because man is made in the image of God he knows very well which side of
the fence he is on and the
>>>Bible speaks to this when in it God says the wicked are " without excuse "
in His eyes. Ro. 1:18-20
>>>
>>>oh yes, the Evolutionists like to call anyone countering their position
filthy names, and in so
>>>doing profess their Original Sin. they need to feel superior and their
best approach is to make
>>>those whom respect the Living God, sound stupid. yet, not one of them is
able to show how life came
>>>from elements that are not alive which is the starting point of proving how
like evolved out of
>>>non-living elements... the elements comprising their human ( not monkey )
bodies are not alive and
>>>are of the same type as those in a dead person. why then is one person
alive and another dead though
>>>they are comprised of the exact same stuff ? because life comes from the
Living God... He gives it
>>>and He takes it back.
>>>
>>>the Evolutionists, as smart as they think they are, can not concoct a
scheme to explain how every
>>>element in them is not alive though they are physically alive.
>>>
>>>Evolution can not be true since it is not possible to get life out of the
non-living elements of the
>>>earth. Evolution is nothing more than an attack against Jesus Christ
Eternal God who spoke the
>>>universe into being and gave life to the living things we see around us,
and we ourselves as well.
>>>
>>>Evolutionists are nothing more than the anti-Christs spoken of in 1 Jn.
2:18.
>>>
>>>interestingly enough, the secular dictionary defines ' atheist ' as one who
denies or disbelieves in
>>>the existence of God or gods. the Word of God, the Bible, defines an '
atheist ' as one whom God
>>>has passed by for salvation which He alone provides. Eph. 2:12
>
>the words of Jesus to the Atheists... " Why do ye not understand my speech?
even because ye cannot
>hear my word. Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father
ye will do. " Jn.
>8:43,44
You twist Jesus' words to fit your own proud ignorance.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
