acfbf6f5
XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.athiesm, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.talk.creationism
From: cootey59@yahoo.com
On 2/05/2010 4:02 AM, All-Seeing-I wrote:
> On Apr 30, 4:55 pm, SkyEyes wrote:
>> On Apr 30, 4:19 am, old man joe wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:30:19 -0700 (PDT), Devils Advocaat wrote:
>>>> On 29 Apr, 13:47, Jimbo wrote:
>>>>> On Apr 29, 7:06 am, "IlBeBa...@gmail.com" wrote:
>>
>>>>>> On Apr 29, 5:41 am, old man joe wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> reason # 1. since all mankind came from Adam and Eve and Adam of his
own free will chose rebellion
>>>>>>> against God rather than obedience, and because of God's judgment
against him, out of whom all
>>>>>>> mankind would be born, all of mankind has Original Sin imputed to
their account Ps. 58:3; Ro.
>>>>>>> 3:10-18... simply put, " a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. "
Mt.7:17
>>
>>>>>>> it's in the best interest of the Evolutionists to say that man came
from a monkey in order to avoid
>>>>>>> being found in Adam, in whom all die. 1 Cor. 15:22 the death in view
here is the Second Death.
>>
>>>>>>> reason # 2. since the Flood is an integral part of God's judgment
against wicked people, as is
>>>>>>> Sodom and Gomorrah, in that He required their life of them that
perished in the Flood of Noah, after
>>>>>>> all, life is His possession, not ours, He can not be stopped when He
requires it back...
>>
>>>>>>> therefore the Evolutionists do not want a Global Flood because the
Global Flood is God's actual
>>>>>>> punishment against one type of people... the sinner, those in
rebellion against God. God is on
>>>>>>> record as once again about to destroy sinner's but this time it will
be the whole universe, after
>>>>>>> the Day of Judgment. Mt. 24
>>
>>>>>>> because man is made in the image of God he knows very well which side
of the fence he is on and the
>>>>>>> Bible speaks to this when in it God says the wicked are " without
excuse " in His eyes. Ro. 1:18-20
>>
>>>>>>> oh yes, the Evolutionists like to call anyone countering their
position filthy names, and in so
>>>>>>> doing profess their Original Sin. they need to feel superior and
their best approach is to make
>>>>>>> those whom respect the Living God, sound stupid. yet, not one of them
is able to show how life came
>>>>>>> from elements that are not alive which is the starting point of
proving how like evolved out of
>>>>>>> non-living elements... the elements comprising their human ( not
monkey ) bodies are not alive and
>>>>>>> are of the same type as those in a dead person. why then is one person
alive and another dead though
>>>>>>> they are comprised of the exact same stuff ? because life comes from
the Living God... He gives it
>>>>>>> and He takes it back.
>>
>>>>>>> the Evolutionists, as smart as they think they are, can not concoct a
scheme to explain how every
>>>>>>> element in them is not alive though they are physically alive.
>>
>>>>>>> Evolution can not be true since it is not possible to get life out of
the non-living elements of the
>>>>>>> earth. Evolution is nothing more than an attack against Jesus Christ
Eternal God who spoke the
>>>>>>> universe into being and gave life to the living things we see around
us, and we ourselves as well.
>>
>>>>>>> Evolutionists are nothing more than the anti-Christs spoken of in 1
Jn. 2:18.
>>
>>>>>>> interestingly enough, the secular dictionary defines ' atheist ' as
one who denies or disbelieves in
>>>>>>> the existence of God or gods. the Word of God, the Bible, defines an
' atheist ' as one whom God
>>>>>>> has passed by for salvation which He alone provides. Eph. 2:12
>>
>>>>>> True what you say.
>>
>>>>> All of the religious moonbats are out today!!
>>
>>>> I wasn't aware that moonbats had any religion. :P
>>
>>> as was already said before your rebuttal, it shows Original Sin is in you
by the name calling you
>>> must resort to in order to cover your ignorance of the Bible and your own
worldly science.
>>
>>> got Darwin ?
>>
>> I'm not ignorant of the bible, I was raised Conservative Baptist.
>>
>> Your problem, Joe, is that *first* you have to provide evidence - you
>> know, things that are objectively factual - that a god *actually
>> exists*.
>>
>> Once you've done that, then you can proceed to convince us that it's
>> the same god that's portrayed in the bible.
>>
>> So: when are you going to do those things?
>>
>> Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
>> BAAWA Knight
>> EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
>> skyeyes nine at cox dot net- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> Why do you guys squeek about evidence all the time?
>
> Science cannot show God because science cannot measure the
> supernatural.
>
> Now, If you actually want evidence for the supernatural, which I
> doubt, then you will have to accept supernatural evidence.
>
> It's an apple to apple thing.
>
it has been pointed out to you many times ........ unsurprisingly being
an illiterate moron ........ you have failed to grasp it.......
so,one more time ........ science is the study of nature ......
supernatural events are .... by definition ..... beyond the natural
..... therefore science cannot say anything about them.
this also leads to the realisation that you can't test for supernatural
events .... they are out of the realms of all our known senses.
Therefore, as far as anyone is concerned, they don't happen.
Of course, if you have some evidence for the supernatural ...... there's
a Nobel prize in for you ...... which we all know aint gonna happen
...... so shut the fuck up already about your delusions ......
--
MA ....Yoiks .... and away .....
Only two things are infinite, the Universe and human stupidity
............. and I'm not sure about the Universe ..........
- A. Einstein
Does Schrödinger's cat have 18 half lives ?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
