Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.flame.jesus.christ    |    But... wasn't he a carpenter?    |    88,286 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 87,187 of 88,286    |
|    fasgnadh to All    |
|    Re: Re: Here's the biggest reason why At    |
|    07 May 10 07:57:47    |
      b1ef8f46       XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.athiesm, alt.atheism       XPost: alt.talk.creationism       From: fasgnadh@yahoo.com.au              L.Roberts plays his tourettaphone:       > fasgnadh wrote:       >> Seon Ferguson wrote this laughable drivel:       >> >       >>> The only thing laughable is religion and why any grown man would       >>> believe in such hogwash.       >>       >>       >> Sure Seon, all these numbskulls wish they had your brilliance       >> and accomplishments; BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHA!              Seon received a Darwin award, not a Nobel prize! B^D              >> The Greatness of God is something we cannot understand even though we       >> are aware of it       >>       >> - Rene Descarte 1596-1650 mathematician and philosopher       >>       >> René Descartes one of the key thinkers of the Scientific Revolution in       >> the Western World. honoured by having the Cartesian coordinate system       >> used in plane geometry and algebra named after him. He did important       >> work on invariants and geometry. His Meditations on First Philosophy       >> partially concerns theology and he was devoted to reconciling his ideas       >> with the dogmas of Catholic Faith to which he was loyal.       >>       >>       >> I see everywhere the inevitable expression of the infinite in the world       >>       >> - Louis Pasteur 1822-95       >>       >> As a blind man has no idea of colours, so have we no idea of the manner       >> by which the All-Wise God perceives and understands all things.       >>       >> - Sir Isaac Newton 1642-1727       >>       >> The scientific picture of the real world around me is very       >> deficient...Science cannot tell us why music delights us, of why and how       >> an old song can move us to tears.... Science is reticent too when it is       >> a question of the great Unity... of which we all somehow form a part, to       >> which we belong. The most popular name for it in our time is God.       >>       >> - Erwin Schroedinger 1933 Nobel prize in Physics       >> "My view of the World" 1918       >>       >> There can never be any real opposition between religion and science.       >> Every serious and reflective person realizes, I think, that the       >> religious elements in his nature must be recognized and cultivated if       >> all the powers of the human soul are to act together in perfect balance       >> and harmony.       >>       >> - Max Planck winner of the 1918 Nobel prize in Physics       >> "Where is Science Going" 1918       >>       >> "Something unknown is doing we don't know what"       >> -Sir Arthur Eddington       >>       >> Religion and science are the two wings upon which man's intelligence can       >> soar into the heights, with which the human soul can progress. It is not       >> possible to fly with one wing alone! Should a man try to fly with the       >> wing of religion alone he would quickly fall into the quagmire of       >> superstition, whilst on the other hand, with the wing of science alone       >> he would make no progress, but fall into the despairing slough of       >> materialism.       >>       >> - 'Abdu'l - Baha "Paris Talks" 1911       >>       >> Fred Hoyle (British astrophysicist): "A common sense interpretation of       >> the facts suggests that a superintellect has monkeyed with physics, as       >> well as with chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces       >> worth speaking about in nature. The numbers one calculates from the       >> facts seem to me so overwhelming as to put this conclusion almost       >> beyond question." (2)       >>       >> George Ellis (British astrophysicist): "Amazing fine tuning occurs in       >> the laws that make this [complexity] possible. Realization of the       >> complexity of what is accomplished makes it very difficult not to use       >> the word 'miraculous' without taking a stand as to the ontological       >> status of the word." (3)       >>       >> Alan Sandage (winner of the Crawford prize in astronomy): "I find it       >> quite improbable that such order came out of chaos. There has to be       >> some organizing principle. God to me is a mystery but is the       >> explanation for the miracle of existence, why there is something       >> instead of nothing." (6)       >>       >> John O'Keefe (astronomer at NASA): "We are, by astronomical standards,       >> a pampered, cosseted, cherished group of creatures.. .. If the       >> Universe had not been made with the most exacting precision we could       >> never have come into existence. It is my view that these circumstances       >> indicate the universe was created for man to live in." (7)       >>       >> George Greenstein (astronomer): "As we survey all the evidence, the       >> thought insistently arises that some supernatural agency - or, rather,       >> Agency - must be involved. Is it possible that suddenly, without       >> intending to, we have stumbled upon scientific proof of the existence       >> of a Supreme Being? Was it God who stepped in and so providentially       >> crafted the cosmos for our benefit?" (8)       >>       >> Arthur Eddington (astrophysicist): "The idea of a universal mind or       >> Logos would be, I think, a fairly plausible inference from the present       >> state of scientific theory." (9)       >>       >> Arno Penzias (Nobel prize in physics): "Astronomy leads us to a unique       >> event, a universe which was created out of nothing, one with the very       >> delicate balance needed to provide exactly the conditions required to       >> permit life, and one which has an underlying (one might say       >> 'supernatural') plan." (10)       >>       >> Roger Penrose (mathematician and author): "I would say the universe       >> has a purpose. It's not there just somehow by chance." (11)       >>       >> Tony Rothman (physicist): "When confronted with the order and beauty       >> of the universe and the strange coincidences of nature, it's very       >> tempting to take the leap of faith from science into religion. I am       >> sure many physicists want to. I only wish they would admit it." (12)       >>       >> Vera Kistiakowsky (MIT physicist): "The exquisite order displayed by       >> our scientific understanding of the physical world calls for the       >> divine." (13)       >>       >> Robert Jastrow (self-proclaimed agnostic): "For the scientist who has       >> lived by his faith in the power of reason, the story ends like a bad       >> dream. He has scaled the mountains of ignorance; he is about to       >> conquer the highest peak; as he pulls himself over the final rock, he       >> is greeted by a band of theologians who have been sitting there for       >> centuries." (14)       >>       >> Stephen Hawking (British astrophysicist): "Then we shall… be able to       >> take part in the discussion of the question of why it is that we and       >> the universe exist. If we find the answer to that, it would be the       >> ultimate triumph of human reason - for then we would know the mind of       >> God." (15)       >>       >> Frank Tipler (Professor of Mathematical Physics): "When I began my       >> career as a cosmologist some twenty years ago, I was a convinced       >> atheist. I never in my wildest dreams imagined that one day I would be              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca