0e2e34df
XPost: alt.talk.creationism, alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.philosophy
From: virgil@ligriv.com
In article
<8264823e-4495-4097-9c27-91c19bf6894e@v16g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>,
AllSeeing-I wrote:
> On Feb 16, 1:08 pm, Conan the bacterium
> wrote:
> > On Feb 16, 10:23 am, All Seeing I wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Feb 16, 7:32 am, "Jonathan" wrote:
> >
> > > > "Richard Cornford" wrote in message
> >
> > > >news:ffef403f-2bb2-41d9-ad4e-b4493b7e0290@l11g2000yqb.goo
legroups.com...
> >
> > > > > On Feb 16, 12:14 pm, Kadaitcha Man wrote:
> > > > >> martin wrote:
> > > > >>> On 16/02/2011 11:42, old man joe wrote:
> >
> > > > >>>> evolution depends on one thing... life coming from the elements
> > > > >>>> of the earth which are not alive.
> >
> > > > >>> wrong.
> >
> > > > >> Is that so?
> >
> > > > > Yes, the statement being criticised is fundamentally erroneous.
> >
> > > > >> Then if life didn't come from basic elements, which are not
> > > > >> alive, where did it come from, you chopfucked flapwit?
> >
> > > > > The statement being criticised does not say that. It says that
> > > > > evolution depends on life coming from the elements of the earth (and
> > > > > depends on nothing else). In reality evolution is about how life
> > > > > changes, and so does not come into play until there is life.
> >
> > > > But the newer science of self organizing systems do have
> > > > something to say about how order can spontaneously form
> > > > and continue to evolve via the same process.
> >
> > <>
> >
> > > ha! "The NEWER science"
> >
> > <>
> >
> > > Is that anything like this year and last years buick?
> >
> > > hahahaha
> >
> > Oh? Perhaps you will explain
> > your hilarity?
> >
> > At one time quantum physics was a
> > "newer science". At one time nuclear
> > physics was a "newer science". At one
> > time solid state physics, the basis of all
> > our electronics, was a "newer science".
> > At one time organic chemistry was
> > a "newer science".
> >
> > The only way you could find that
> > incongruous is if you feel that
> > science already explains everything.
> >
> > None of us who actually understand
> > science think it already has all the answers.
> >
> > For which we are quite grateful.
> >
> > conan
>
> In this case it is not science. It is junk-science
If anything in these posts is junky, it is your junky cretinist IDiocy
--
Evolution-denial is morally equivalent to holocaust-denial
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
