XPost: alt.talk.creationism, alt.philosophy   
   From: lunch@nofreelunch.us   
      
   On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 23:51:19 -0700, Virgil  wrote in   
   alt.talk.creationism:   
      
   >In article ,   
   > us4zion@att.net wrote:   
   >   
   >   
   >> It makes perfect sense. You do not believe God and you do not believe me.   
   >   
   >How can one believe a god which never says anything to that one on its   
   >own?   
   >   
   >If it cannot speak for itself, how can we be sure it is not a mere   
   >sockpuppet?   
      
   Isn't it nice that he now has talked himself into thinking that he talks   
   for a god that does not exist?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)