XPost: alt.talk.creationism, alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.philosophy   
   From: les@fakeaddress.com   
      
   On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 05:24:21 -0400, old man joe   
    wrote:   
      
   >On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:59:39 -0700 (PDT), Devils Advocaat  wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Apr 20, 1:18 pm, old man joe  wrote:   
   >>> evolution depends on one thing... life coming from the elements of the   
   earth which are not alive.   
   >>   
   >>Okay now, if I took some of your blood and removed the iron atoms from   
   >>it, and then took a lump of haematite and removed the iron atoms from   
   >>it, and then mixed all those iron atoms up, would you be able to   
   >>distinguish the iron atoms that came from your blood by any quality   
   >>that the iron atoms from the haematite don't possess?   
   >   
   >off topic... where life really comes from is the topic... life if not found   
   in any form of iron.   
   >life comes from the Living God...   
      
   Do you wish us to accept this assertion just on your say-so?   
   >   
   >"  And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into   
   his nostrils the breath   
   >of life; and man became a living soul. "  Gen.2:7   
      
   Do you wish us to accept this assertion from an unkown author from a   
   past far more ignorant that we are know just on his say-so?  For   
   example the anonymous author could not have known that the human body   
   is almost 40% water (hydrogen and Oxygen), not the sort of thing you   
   find in a dry and dusty desert region is it?   
      
   >the " dust of the ground " is the non-living elements of the earth while the   
   " breath of life "   
   >which only God has is not of this earth since the Living God is not of this   
   earth...   
   >   
   >"  And he ( Jesus Christ ) said unto them, Ye are from beneath; I am from   
   above: ye are of this   
   >world; I am not of this world. "  Joh 8:23   
      
   Do you wish me to accept this asserion by Joh (whoever Joh is) just on   
   his say-so?   
      
   You seem to be wanting us to accept a lot of assertion simply on the   
   say so of others some of whom are not even identified. If I make an   
   assertion, such as, 'you are a prat' would you accept it from me just   
   on my say-so?   
      
      
   Les Hellawell   
   Greetings from:   
   Yorkshire -The White Rose County   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)