Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.flame.jesus.christ    |    But... wasn't he a carpenter?    |    88,286 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 87,525 of 88,286    |
|    R Brown to All    |
|    Re: Evolution is still Big Baloney becau    |
|    01 Jul 12 15:48:49    |
      XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.athiesm, alt.atheism       XPost: alt.talk.creationism, sci.skeptic       From: brownr@nowhere.com              Ps.119 wrote:              >       > the Big Bang Theory was concocted in the last century. today, the       > idea is feed to the gullible through media in the form of cartoons.       > this Big Bang idea starts off without a starting place... the '       > stuff ' of the universe was " always there." this, at least, leaves       > ' scientific ' thinker's with a model to work with but leaves out an       > extremely important foundation to build their model on... all the       > while bypassing this and other extremely important factors that are       > required to make their model tenable.       >       > while the focus is on the ' stuff '... that is to say, the matter       > which Big Banged it's way into the entire universe, the ' science '       > needed to prove where this matter came from in the first place is       > completely avoided. it can not be proven by any means in the realm       > of science exactly where this matter came from... to say it was       > "always there " does not prove it's existence came from no where.       > such amounts to making a fact out of a guess.       >       > so now we have on the table a something in the realm of ' science '       > telling us that matter came from no where. this violates their own "       > scientific " law of Conservation of Mass/Energy which states that       > matter can not be created or destroyed... that's why they must       > conclude that the universe was " always there. " the idea that       > matter was " always there" just waiting to Big Bang it's way into the       > universe we have today, is untenable.       >       > along with that, these ' scientists ' also avoid the proof of where       > space came from. to say it was 'always there ' doesn't prove how       > it came to be... the big question is " how it came to be " simply       > because it's inconceivable that something came from no where. the       > mass of matter which big banged wasn't laying on a table. no, it was       > floating in space as they would have us to presume.       >       > now we have two things conveniently avoided by the ' scientific '       > mind... no proof of how matter came to be and no proof of how space       > came to be. that it was " always there " is pushed along as fact       > needing no proof. one of their kind actually attempts to answer this       > charge by claiming when this matter, which came from no where, but       > was always there, created space when the matter big banged. really ?       > prove it.       >       > yet another unbelievable proof in the scientific realm of no facts       > equal truth is the fantastic story that this matter, which was always       > there, all in one place mind you, exploded into space that was always       > there and magically, life began on what they call " early earth " and       > out of absolute sterility no less... or maybe life began in the       > sea... or maybe life began in outer space... lots of maybe's to       > choose from.       >       > in the Periodic Table of Elements from which everything is comprised       > we find nothing alive. yet, the human body for example, which is       > made up of certain elements all found in the Periodic Table, is       > alive. and, a dead human's body contains the same elements as the       > living person but one body is alive and the other is dead. it       > doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that life is not of       > this world.       >       > when it comes to real life and the departing from speculation based       > on dreams ( and cartoons ) we have a far different beginning than any       > scientist can concoct... the Living God spoke the universe into       > existence and He created living beings and living things from the       > non-living elements of the earth. only in the Lord God is life.       > this is a far more rational approach to where it all came from. such       > an approach respects the person as well as the Creator.       >       > and, everyone knows this though their own disdain for God leads them       > to deny God as even existing. but no one can run away from the       > simple fact that it is God who tells us He and He alone has made His       > existence known to every rational person through Creation and on a       > personal level as well, as He say in Romans 1:18 and following.       >       > the Big Banger's have no self respect. this is unavoidable for them       > since Atheists are Atheists from cradle to grave. you can read that       > in your Bible in Ps. 58:3. as He says... " that which is known about       > God is evident within them; for God made it evident to them. "... "       > so they are without excuse. " Ro. 1:18-20       >       > so then, Evolution is baloney because the Big Bang is baloney. and       > even without the Big Bang idea ( a Atheist Roman Catholic Monsignor       > dreamed up the Big Bang idea ) it's impossible for life to have       > started all by itself from elements that are not alive to this day       > only to later evolve into other living things.       >       > in conclusion, the difference between fact and fiction is that God       > took it upon Himself to make Himself known to every rational       > person... yes, even the Atheist cursing God and blaming Creationist's       > for his own total inability to be truthful to himself. they must       > hide behind cursing Creationist's in desperate hope of trying to look       > superior... a cheap cop-out stemming from denial.       >       >       >       >       >              Another home skooler tries to take on the Big Bang. Forget it pal.       Leave the intellectual heavy lifting to those with an education -       you're only going to tear all the ligaments in your head.              That's why I say ...              "When you're talking with a creationist, it's not the heat, it's the       stupidity." - R.Brown                     --              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca