XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.athiesm, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
   From: lunch@nofreelunch.us   
      
   On Wed, 03 Sep 2014 18:58:07 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:   
      
   >On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 13:04:08 -0500, Free Lunch  wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 15:56:26 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 01:57:08 +0100 (BST), Steve    
   wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>In article    
   >>>>mur@.not. wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> On Sat, 23 Aug 2014 07:45:11 -0400, ¶       <> wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> >the atheist has conditioned himself to suppress the knowledge of God   
   within himself as   
   >>>>> >we read in v.18 and following of Romans chapter one... he's his own   
   worse enemy hating the fact that   
   >>>>> >God has exposed his inner, secret thoughts making such... public   
   knowledge.   
   >>>>> .   
   >>>>>     They expose their own thoughts making it known that they believe God   
   does   
   >>>>> not exist, yet most of them are ashamed of and want to deny that belief   
   even   
   >>>>> after they have made it clear that they have it.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Spam.   
   >>>   
   >>>    It's a fact that the majority of atheists I've encountered who clearly   
   >>>appear to believe God does not exist, are ashamed to admit it. VERY few   
   have not   
   >>>been ashamed to admit it. By your own response to what I pointed out you   
   make it   
   >>>clear that you are ashamed of the situation yourself.   
   >>   
   >>The greatest likelihood is that every god ever taught is a complete   
   >>fabrication by people who were telling just-so stories to explain things   
   >>they were unable to explain because they didn't know enough. Other gods   
   >>and god attributes were invented by priests for their own personal   
   >>aggrandizement.   
   >   
   >    If God does exist I have no doubt that everyone has some incorrect   
   >interpretations about him. None more so than atheists of course, but I feel   
   sure   
   >everybody has some to varying degrees.   
      
   I have no need to worry about any gods.   
      
   >>No evidence supports any claim that any god exists.   
   >   
   >    Try to explain WHAT sort of evidence you think there "should be", WHERE   
   you   
   >think it "should be", and WHY you think it "should be" to God's benefit for   
   him   
   >to provide us with it if he exists.   
      
   I don't think there is any specific evidence that should apply to any   
   gods, but if you tell me what your religion teaches then your religion   
   is telling you what evidence should exist. Any religion that makes   
   claims about a god implies obvious evidence that should exist to show   
   that the religious claims are valid. Any religion that makes excuses for   
   why that evidence does not exist is totally untrustworthy.   
      
   >>I am not ashamed not to believe the indefensible claims made about gods.   
   >   
   >    You've made it clear that you believe God does not exist:   
   >   
   >"It is clear that there is no need for an intelligent being." - Free Lunch   
   >   
   >"all gods are human inventions" - Free Lunch   
   >   
   >"The gods of the theists who bother us here don't exist, even in non-god   
   form."   
   >- Free Lunch   
      
   I have made it clear that I do not believe in any gods that any   
   religions teach because no religion is able to back up its claims.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)