XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.athiesm, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
      
   On Fri, 05 Sep 2014 09:16:47 -0500, Free Lunch  wrote:   
   .   
   >On Wed, 03 Sep 2014 18:27:00 -0600, Uergil  wrote:   
   >   
   >>In article , mur@.not.   
   >>wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> Most that I've encountered try to claim they have no belief. Not believing   
   >>> any gods exist can mean having no belief, or it could mean believing no   
   gods   
   >>> exist. Even after making it clear they believe no gods exist many atheists   
   >>   
   >>Most atheists only SUSPECT that no gods exist, but are not certain   
   >>because they cannot absolutely prove it.   
   >>   
   >> Those who claim otherwise have no idea what atheists are like!   
   >   
   >Atheists do not believe in any gods. Suspect is a meaningless word in   
   >this context. Theists know they cannot support their belief in their   
   >gods with evidence.   
      
       Try to explain WHAT sort of evidence you think there "should be", WHERE you   
   think it "should be", and WHY you think it "should be" to God's benefit for him   
   to provide us with it if he exists.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)