XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism, alt.philosophy   
   XPost: alt.talk.creationism   
   From: lunch@nofreelunch.us   
      
   On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 11:30:12 -0400, August Rode    
   wrote:   
      
   >On 07/09/2014 11:22 AM, Free Lunch wrote:   
   >> On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 10:03:59 -0400, James <1rilu2@windstream.net> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> raven1    
   >>>> On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 06:26:41 -0400, ¶ <> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> Everybody knows all matter is comprised of Elements of the Periodic   
   Table... none of which are   
   >>>>> alive.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Everybody knows that water is comprised of hydrogen and oxygen,   
   >>>> neither of which is a liquid, therefore, water isn't a liquid either.   
   >>>> When are you going to stop repeating your absurd composition fallacy?   
   >>>   
   >>> But he is right. How do you explain LIFE coming from all non-life   
   >>> material. Are you saying if you slap together all the complexities of   
   >>> a human body, it will magically come to life? What about a dead person   
   >>> who just died with his heart stopping? He is still made of the same   
   >>> stuff, but WITHOUT life!   
   >>   
   >> Where else would life come from? Life is a self-sustaining biochemical   
   >> reaction.   
   >   
   >Ermm... Life is a *complex suite* of self-sustaining biochemical reactions.   
      
   But of course...   
      
   >> There's nothing magical about it, as theists appear to assume.   
   >>   
   >>> Your combination of two gasses to produce a liquid, although cleaver   
   >>> sounding, has nothing to do with LIFE. So you need a better analogy if   
   >>> you can come up with one.   
   >>>   
   >>> So answer the question, how do you get life, from non-life? Is it a   
   >>> miracle? No, we can't have that, can we. So then how?   
   >>   
   >> It's not a miracle because it is just normal chemical processes.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)