XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism, alt.philosophy   
   XPost: alt.talk.creationism   
      
   On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 10:22:50 -0500, Free Lunch  wrote:   
      
   >On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 10:03:59 -0400, James <1rilu2@windstream.net> wrote:   
   >   
   >>raven1    
   >>>On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 06:26:41 -0400, ¶ <> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>Everybody knows all matter is comprised of Elements of the Periodic   
   Table... none of which are   
   >>>>alive.   
   >>>   
   >>>Everybody knows that water is comprised of hydrogen and oxygen,   
   >>>neither of which is a liquid, therefore, water isn't a liquid either.   
   >>>When are you going to stop repeating your absurd composition fallacy?   
   >>   
   >>But he is right. How do you explain LIFE coming from all non-life   
   >>material. Are you saying if you slap together all the complexities of   
   >>a human body, it will magically come to life? What about a dead person   
   >>who just died with his heart stopping? He is still made of the same   
   >>stuff, but WITHOUT life!   
   >   
   >Where else would life come from? Life is a self-sustaining biochemical   
   >reaction. There's nothing magical about it, as theists appear to assume.   
      
   "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." -   
   Arthur   
   C. Clarke   
      
   >>Your combination of two gasses to produce a liquid, although cleaver   
   >>sounding, has nothing to do with LIFE. So you need a better analogy if   
   >>you can come up with one.   
   >>   
   >>So answer the question, how do you get life, from non-life? Is it a   
   >>miracle? No, we can't have that, can we. So then how?   
   >   
   >It's not a miracle because it is just normal chemical processes.   
      
       Even IF humans eventually learn to produce life from lifeless material life   
   might STILL REMAIN evidence of God's existence.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)