XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism, alt.philosophy   
   XPost: alt.talk.creationism   
   From: malte_runz@forgitit.dk   
      
   "James"  skrev i meddelelsen   
   news:ks911a57oju6tr5v64rkn4imbsonmau0bu@4ax.com...   
   >   
      
   >   
   > Thus if they DO create life from non-life in the lab, it shows it   
   > requires sophisticated and state of the art equipment, ...   
      
   No it doesn't.   
      
   > ... as well as a   
   > deep understanding of biological life. In other words, it takes GREAT   
   > INTELLECT to create life from non-life.   
      
   I'd say it takes great knowledge of chemistry and other scientific   
   disciplines to figure out how to create life, but once a technique has been   
   discovered, it'll become 'easy' to create.   
      
   >   
   > Yet sadly, people believe that no mind created the complexities of a   
   > life. Just random forces acting on non-life materials. ...   
      
   Let's say, for argument's sake, that it takes ten elements, added to the   
   brew at specific intervals, temperatures and pressure to make a simple   
   lifeform. It doesn't matter whether the process takes place in a lab, is an   
   unguided, random series of events happening in nature or something God   
   orchestrates. The result will be the same. Your job, as a creationist, is to   
   show that option two, the unguided, random series of events happening in   
   nature, cannot possibly happen.   
      
      
   > ... (I am waiting   
   > for my car to become alive, so I can sit back and enjoy the ride)   
      
   Your strawman shows how little you actually understand.   
      
      
   --   
   Malte Runz   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)