XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism, alt.philosophy   
   XPost: alt.talk.creationism   
   From: malte_runz@forgitit.dk   
      
   "James"  skrev i meddelelsen   
   news:hfs31a14s4d28i2oaf3n135inids4t1ht6@4ax.com...   
      
   (snip)   
      
   > Anybody that knows me knows I hold true science with highest regards.   
      
   If you could hear yourself through the ears of a scientist, you'd piss your   
   pants from laughter.   
      
   > After all, it was God who created all the natural sciences. So who   
   > should know most about them, than Almighty God.   
      
   Too bad your god is imaginary.   
      
   > But pseudoscience ...   
      
   Creationist science is the quintessence of pseudoscience.   
      
   > ... like macroevolution brings shame to those scientists   
   > who endorse it and teach it. They should know better. And it goes   
   > against the fossil record. ...   
      
   The fossil record supports 'macroeveolution'. That's how scientist got the   
   idea in the first place.   
      
   But since you hold true science with the highest regards, why don't you   
   supply some true scientific evidence that falsifies the 'macroevolutionary'   
   part of the ToE?   
      
      
   > ... The Bible is closer to supporting the   
   > fossil record, than the macroevolution advocates ever were.   
      
   Again, I recommend that you back up your claims with evidence and not mere   
   assertions.   
      
   > ... Even   
   > Darwin admitted that.   
      
   Of course he didn't, but if he had done so, it would mean absolutely nothing   
   to the ToE anno 2014. Darwin is not an authority anymore.   
      
      
   --   
   Malte Runz   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)