XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism, alt.philosophy   
   XPost: alt.talk.creationism   
      
   On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 21:52:16 +0200, "Malte Runz"    
   wrote:   
   .   
   >"James"  skrev i meddelelsen   
   >news:ks911a57oju6tr5v64rkn4imbsonmau0bu@4ax.com...   
   >>   
   >   
   >>   
   >> Thus if they DO create life from non-life in the lab, it shows it   
   >> requires sophisticated and state of the art equipment, ...   
   >   
   >No it doesn't.   
   >   
   >> ... as well as a   
   >> deep understanding of biological life. In other words, it takes GREAT   
   >> INTELLECT to create life from non-life.   
   >   
   >I'd say it takes great knowledge of chemistry and other scientific   
   >disciplines to figure out how to create life, but once a technique has been   
   >discovered, it'll become 'easy' to create.   
   >   
   >>   
   >> Yet sadly, people believe that no mind created the complexities of a   
   >> life. Just random forces acting on non-life materials. ...   
   >   
   >Let's say, for argument's sake, that it takes ten elements, added to the   
   >brew at specific intervals, temperatures and pressure to make a simple   
   >lifeform. It doesn't matter whether the process takes place in a lab, is an   
   >unguided, random series of events happening in nature or something God   
   >orchestrates. The result will be the same. Your job, as a creationist, is to   
   >show that option two, the unguided, random series of events happening in   
   >nature, cannot possibly happen.   
      
       So far humans have only produced evidence of that being the case.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)