XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism, alt.philosophy   
   XPost: alt.talk.creationism   
   From: lunch@nofreelunch.us   
      
   On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:38:51 -0400, James <1rilu2@windstream.net> wrote:   
      
   >"Malte Runz"    
   >>"James"  skrev i meddelelsen   
   >>news:5uud1adofqh86edvu7tdbsiq61p82dj562@4ax.com...   
   >>>   
   >>> Free Lunch    
   >>   
   >>(snip)   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>> >And when there is life in a lab, you will say that is evidence that we   
   >>> >needed intelligence.   
   >>>   
   >>> Would that not be a true statement? ...   
   >>   
   >>It's true that it takes intelligent people to figure out which chemicals to   
   >>mix and under what condition. But it's not (human) intelligence that makes   
   >>the chemistry react in the predictable manner.   
   >   
   >Well, if the natural formation of some chemicals is 1 in a million,   
   >and the lab immediately puts them together, then intelligence is   
   >jump-starting nature to produce the desired results.   
      
   But you are denying that life could arise in a billion years in billions   
   of possible environmental niches. Why?   
      
   >>> ... It would take state of the art   
   >>> scientific machines, and an abundant knowledge of biology etc, to   
   >>> creat life from nonlife. Nature has neither, yet you are giving her   
   >>> credit for doing so.   
   >>   
   >>Acid turns litmus red whether it's Einstein mixing the two, or it's a random   
   >>incident taking place, unguided in nature.   
   >   
   >Yes, nature can produce acids of varying kinds, but where does the   
   >litmus paper come from? Again you need intellegence and good lab   
   >equipment in order to attempt to produce life from non life.   
      
   Why do you claim that there is no way for life to arise naturally? Show   
   us exactly what the limitation is.   
      
   >>> >Your ignorance of science and blind adherence to   
   >>> >religious dogma makes it impossible for you to engage in informed   
   >>> >discussion.   
   >>>   
   >>> On the contrary, your dedication to the latest scientific false theory   
   >>> blinds your eyes to the real truths from the Bible.   
   >>   
   >>Can God make litmus turn green in acid?   
   >   
   >A piece of cake if He wanted to. What has that got to do with   
   >producing life from non life?   
      
   You are the one who has been misled about the beginning of life.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)