XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism, alt.philosophy   
   XPost: alt.talk.creationism   
   From: lunch@nofreelunch.us   
      
   On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:21:18 -0500, duke  wrote:   
      
   >On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:38:51 -0400, James <1rilu2@windstream.net> wrote:   
   >   
   >>"Malte Runz"    
   >>>"James"  skrev i meddelelsen   
   >>>news:5uud1adofqh86edvu7tdbsiq61p82dj562@4ax.com...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Free Lunch    
   >>>   
   >>>(snip)   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>> >And when there is life in a lab, you will say that is evidence that we   
   >>>> >needed intelligence.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Would that not be a true statement? ...   
   >>>   
   >>>It's true that it takes intelligent people to figure out which chemicals to   
   >>>mix and under what condition. But it's not (human) intelligence that makes   
   >>>the chemistry react in the predictable manner.   
   >>   
   >>Well, if the natural formation of some chemicals is 1 in a million,   
   >>and the lab immediately puts them together, then intelligence is   
   >>jump-starting nature to produce the desired results.   
   >   
   >God established the combination to produce a specific result.   
      
   Theists have such an easy time making that claim, but then they fail   
   completely to show that the claim is true.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)