XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism, alt.philosophy   
   XPost: alt.talk.creationism   
   From: malte_runz@forgitit.dk   
      
   "James"  skrev i meddelelsen   
   news:18cj1adsa1ouhgkea5f55k0l116d2c470q@4ax.com...   
   >   
   > Free Lunch    
   (snip)   
      
   > >You keep making excuses for your religious teachings and falsely   
   > >claiming your misrepresentations of science are true.   
   >   
   > The Bible's discussion of science is true.  And if I accurately   
   > portray the Bible's discussion of science, then what I say is true   
   > also.   
   >   
   > Do you have an example of what you call a 'false' Biblical science   
   > teaching?   
      
   You have got to be kidding!   
      
   (snip)   
      
   > >There is nothing erroneous about speciation. Of course many religious   
   > >folks have a private, absurd definition of macroevolution.   
   >   
   > The Bible account of creation is closer to the truth and the fossil   
   > record, than your theory of macroevolution.   
      
   What the...? Even if there was no kind of evolution at all, the Biblical   
   account is still incorrect. The fossil record shows that 99% of all   
   lifeforms came and went before man showed his face on Earth. The fossil   
   record shows that man has only been on Earth for a fraction of the time   
   since it came into existence.   
   And so on.   
      
   (snip)   
      
   > Show me from the Bible, what you call an 'inaccurate' science   
   > statement.   
      
   You're leaving yourself wide open.   
      
   >   
   > Yes, many people have adhered to that ridiculous theory and highly   
   > failed to waver my Bible facts that are in harmony with the fossil   
   > record.   
      
   Are you the same James who claimed he loved true science?   
      
   (snip)   
      
   > >Let's start with the most obvious fictions Creation and the Flood. You   
   > >know that the scientific evidence shows that both stories are fiction.   
   >   
   > Not at all. Both accouts are right on the money. In what ways do you   
   > say they are wrong?   
      
   The world wasn't completely covered in water 4000 years ago.   
   There is no universal genetic bottleneck dating back 4000 years.   
      
   And so on.   
      
      
   --   
   Malte Runz   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)