XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism, alt.philosophy   
   XPost: alt.talk.creationism   
      
   On Sat, 13 Sep 2014 11:25:40 -0500, Free Lunch  wrote:   
   .   
   >On Sat, 13 Sep 2014 11:57:16 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 18:16:00 -0500, Free Lunch  wrote:   
   >>.   
   >>>On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 16:05:38 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>On Tue, 09 Sep 2014 18:36:15 -0500, Free Lunch    
   wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>On Tue, 09 Sep 2014 11:35:37 -0400, James <1rilu2@windstream.net> wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>Free Lunch    
   >>>>>>>On Mon, 08 Sep 2014 08:24:07 -0400, James <1rilu2@windstream.net> wrote:   
   >...   
   >>>>>>>>What is the mechanism or energy that   
   >>>>>>>>causes life to appear in a life form? Alien technology from the galaxy   
   >>>>>>>>Andromeda?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>No gods needed.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>Then its aliens?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>No.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>    Unless you can explain how God could be native to Earth, if he exists   
   he   
   >>>>would have to be an alien. How could a being be the God of a planet he is   
   native   
   >>>>to anyway?   
   >>>   
   >>>I don't explain any gods because I am not a theist. If you want to know   
   >>>about that, ask theists, atheists don't care about theistic claims.   
   >>   
   >>    So you had no idea what you thought you were trying to talk about when   
   you   
   >>said "no". Why do you make claims pretending to have some clue, when you   
   clearly   
   >>have no clue at all?   
   >   
   >I don't have any reason to accept your unsubstantiated assumption that   
   >gods exist or have something to do with life on earth.   
      
       Regardless of that your "no" was still a clueless response.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)