XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.athiesm, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
   From: me@nothere.biz   
      
   On 22-September-2014 12:08 AM, Free Lunch wrote:   
      
   > On Sun, 21 Sep 2014 13:17:56 +1000, felix_unger  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 14-September-2014 2:08 AM, Free Lunch wrote:   
   >>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2014 11:57:07 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:54:14 -0500, Free Lunch    
   wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:47:16 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >>> ....   
   >>>>>>      "The gods of the theists who bother us here don't exist, even in   
   non-god   
   >>>>>> form." - Free Lunch   
   >>>>> The fact that we don't bother trying to decide of the entire set of all   
   >>>>> possible gods do or do not exist does not affect the fact that the gods   
   >>>>> preached by the theist fools who waste our time in alt.atheism do not   
   >>>>> exist.   
   >>>>      Present your evidence, not just the possibility you've put your   
   faith in.   
   >>> Define your god for me so I can show you that your god does not exist.   
   >> which dictionary would you like to use? pick one, and look up the word   
   >> 'God'. even atheists should be able to accomplish that!   
   > There have been thousands of gods worshipped. Sure you capitalized it,   
   > which implies that you are talking about the God of Abraham? Do you   
   > refer to the god that was the jealous god that hated it when other gods   
   > were worshipped? Do you refer to the only god that Islam and Judaism   
   > worship today? Do you refer to the triune god of most of Christianity?   
   > Do you refer to the more interesting gods invented by LDS and other   
   > newer denominations?   
      
   as has been pointed out to you in the past my mur, ppl can believe all   
   sorts of things about God, but that will not alter the fact of whether   
   God exists or not.   
      
   >   
   > Tell me what you think your god is and does. Define the attributes. Is   
   > your god all knowing, all kind, all powerful? What is it?   
      
   that's another matter, isn't it   
      
   >   
   >>> Until you offer a well-defined god, there is nothing to discuss. Not   
   >>> only is it too vague to be useful, but some theists will keep redefining   
   >>> their god to make excuses for why their prior definition made it   
   >>> impossible for that god to exist.   
   >>>   
   >>>>> When you find some evidence to support a god, get back to us.   
   >>>>      You lie about the evidence you are presented with, yet have no   
   >>>> clue...LOL...what sort of evidence you think there should be. It's still   
   amusing   
   >>>> just describing your position.   
   >>> You have never offered any evidence. You know that. I have never lied   
   >>> about any evidence that has been presented because we all know that   
   >>> there has never been any evidence presented to show that any god exists.   
   >> you keep saying that any evidence for God is not evidence, so there's no   
   >> point in even trying to discuss with you   
   > You have no evidence for your god. Things that are not evidence do not   
   > become evidence merely because you believe they should be evidence.   
      
   things that are evidence do not cease to become evidence merely because   
   you believe they are not   
      
      
      
   --   
   rgds,   
      
   Pete   
   -------   
   election results explained: http://ausnet.info/pics/labor_wins2.jpg   
   “People sleep peacefully in their beds only because rough   
   men stand ready to do violence on their behalf”   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)