XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism, alt.philosophy   
   XPost: alt.talk.creationism   
   From: lunch@nofreelunch.us   
      
   On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 18:34:14 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:   
      
   >On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:41:01 -0500, Free Lunch  wrote:   
   >.   
   >>On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:20:29 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>On Sat, 13 Sep 2014 11:25:40 -0500, Free Lunch  wrote:   
   >>>.   
   >>>>On Sat, 13 Sep 2014 11:57:16 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 18:16:00 -0500, Free Lunch    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>.   
   >>>>>>On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 16:05:38 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>On Tue, 09 Sep 2014 18:36:15 -0500, Free Lunch    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>On Tue, 09 Sep 2014 11:35:37 -0400, James <1rilu2@windstream.net>   
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>Free Lunch    
   >>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 08 Sep 2014 08:24:07 -0400, James <1rilu2@windstream.net>   
   wrote:   
   >>>>...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>What is the mechanism or energy that   
   >>>>>>>>>>>causes life to appear in a life form? Alien technology from the   
   galaxy   
   >>>>>>>>>>>Andromeda?   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>No gods needed.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>Then its aliens?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>No.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>    Unless you can explain how God could be native to Earth, if he   
   exists he   
   >>>>>>>would have to be an alien. How could a being be the God of a planet he   
   is native   
   >>>>>>>to anyway?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>I don't explain any gods because I am not a theist. If you want to know   
   >>>>>>about that, ask theists, atheists don't care about theistic claims.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>    So you had no idea what you thought you were trying to talk about   
   when you   
   >>>>>said "no". Why do you make claims pretending to have some clue, when you   
   clearly   
   >>>>>have no clue at all?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>I don't have any reason to accept your unsubstantiated assumption that   
   >>>>gods exist or have something to do with life on earth.   
   >>>   
   >>>    Regardless of that your "no" was still a clueless response.   
   >>   
   >>You are the one who foolishly decided that aliens are the only   
   >>alternative to gods   
   >   
   >    You've revealed the fact that YOU ALSO don't believe a God could be native   
   >to a planet he is the God of. You may not and probably can't consider the   
   topic   
   >in any realistic way(s) at all, but you've shown you had no reason to say   
   "no".   
      
   Feel free to invent new definitions of gods. I will feel free to ignore   
   your added silliness.   
      
   ...   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)