XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism, alt.philosophy   
   XPost: alt.talk.creationism   
      
   On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 18:24:10 -0500, Free Lunch  wrote:   
   .   
   >On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 18:34:14 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:41:01 -0500, Free Lunch  wrote:   
   >>.   
   >>>On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:20:29 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>On Sat, 13 Sep 2014 11:25:40 -0500, Free Lunch    
   wrote:   
   >>>>.   
   >>>>>On Sat, 13 Sep 2014 11:57:16 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 18:16:00 -0500, Free Lunch    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>.   
   >>>>>>>On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 16:05:38 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>On Tue, 09 Sep 2014 18:36:15 -0500, Free Lunch    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>On Tue, 09 Sep 2014 11:35:37 -0400, James <1rilu2@windstream.net>   
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>Free Lunch    
   >>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 08 Sep 2014 08:24:07 -0400, James <1rilu2@windstream.net>   
   wrote:   
   >>>>>...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>What is the mechanism or energy that   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>causes life to appear in a life form? Alien technology from the   
   galaxy   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>Andromeda?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>No gods needed.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>Then its aliens?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>No.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>    Unless you can explain how God could be native to Earth, if he   
   exists he   
   >>>>>>>>would have to be an alien. How could a being be the God of a planet he   
   is native   
   >>>>>>>>to anyway?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>I don't explain any gods because I am not a theist. If you want to know   
   >>>>>>>about that, ask theists, atheists don't care about theistic claims.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>    So you had no idea what you thought you were trying to talk about   
   when you   
   >>>>>>said "no". Why do you make claims pretending to have some clue, when you   
   clearly   
   >>>>>>have no clue at all?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>I don't have any reason to accept your unsubstantiated assumption that   
   >>>>>gods exist or have something to do with life on earth.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>    Regardless of that your "no" was still a clueless response.   
   >>>   
   >>>You are the one who foolishly decided that aliens are the only   
   >>>alternative to gods   
   >>   
   >>    You've revealed the fact that YOU ALSO don't believe a God could be   
   native   
   >>to a planet he is the God of. You may not and probably can't consider the   
   topic   
   >>in any realistic way(s) at all, but you've shown you had no reason to say   
   "no".   
   >>   
   >>>in causing life on earth.   
   >>   
   >>    Even IF humans are eventually able to produce life from lifeless material   
   >>life might STILL REMAIN evidence of God's existence as it still is today.   
   >>   
   >>>You have chosen to be a   
   >>>fool. I quite understand how little you understand about science   
   >>   
   >>    I'm able to consider how science, evolution, and God could all be part of   
   >>the same big picture. You're not.   
   >>   
   >>>or religion or anything else. I am quite happy not to be you.   
   >>>   
   >>>Keep worshipping your own ignorance. You'll stay happy.   
   >>   
   >>    You try to pretend you have some superior information yet you're unable   
   to   
   >>even attempt to explain what you think it is. I challenge you to try to   
   explain   
   >>why I should put my faith in the one possibility that there is no God   
   associated   
   >>with Earth. I do consider it, but you need to give good detailed reason(s)   
   why I   
   >>should put faith in that being the correct possibility before I could ever   
   have   
   >>any reason to consider the possibility that you're somehow in a superior   
   >>position. So far all you've shown is that you're able to consider LESS than I   
   >>am, certainly not as much, and most especially not more.   
   >   
   >Feel free to invent new definitions of gods. I will feel free to ignore   
   >your added silliness.   
      
       You can't comprehend the possibility at all. It's not that you "feel free   
   to   
   ignore" it. It's that you're not mentally capable of thinking about it   
   realistically even if you wanted to. The only question is what restricts you   
   from having the ability. Is your little mind so physically limited that even   
   such an easy concept is physically beyond what it's able to handle? Or is there   
   something else restricting you from being capable? THAT second possibility is   
   how you atheists are evidence of God's existence by being evidence of Satan's   
   influence on human brains.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)