XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism, alt.philosophy   
   XPost: alt.antichristnet, alt.talk.creationism   
      
   On Wed, 01 Oct 2014 06:30:41 -0400, ¶ <> wrote:   
   .   
   >Evolutionists actually think a one cell creature thing-a-me-bob gave itself   
   life from the Elements   
   >of the Period Table... the Table of Elements none of which are labeled '   
   Alive ' ... from an " early   
   >earth " of 10 billion degrees, described by them as absolutely sterile... a   
   burning, boiling, toxic   
   >place impossible to generate life after it cooled down.  Sterile means   
   sterile.   
   >   
   >This amazing one celled thing finds food somewhere... which also gave itself   
   life... ( where food   
   >for it came from they don't say. Oh yes, they like to say ' algae ' but algae   
   is alive and they   
   >haven't proved how non-living Elements gave itself life out of absolute   
   sterility )   
   >How it found food they don't say... work, requires an energy source.  It   
   would mean that the one   
   >celled thing and food developed at the same time.   
   >   
   >Nonetheless, this one celled thing eventually develops's feet to get around   
   to find food and water   
   >and botta-bing... it finds a mate !  Now, it can reproduce after it own   
   kind... but it does more   
   >than that... it mutates into a different species. Amazing.   
      
       And without leaving traces of lots of transition species between reptiles   
   and birds, etc. I've seen atheists claim that other people don't understand   
   evolution etc, but even when challenged to directly I haven't seen any of them   
   try to explain why there should NOT be fossils of animals in such transition   
   positions. They also can't explain why there aren't animals in those same types   
   of positions still today. They can't give a person anything realistic to   
   consider even when they're challenge to. I do believe evolution took place, and   
   consider the possibility that it all just happened to happend just by chance.   
   But I also consider the possibility that God controlled how things evolved and   
   that's how he did his creating, and the lack of evidence of animals in   
   transition states is evidence that it did not all just happen to happen. And   
   that IS evidence of God's existence, whether there's any God associated with   
   Earth or not.   
      
   >Low and behold, eon's pass by and the thing-a-me-bob has arms and legs and   
   vision, hearing, a sense   
   >of balance and an innate sense of right and wrong. Wow.   
   >   
   >Where did an irrational thing-a-me-bob get morals ???   
   >   
   >Huh !  From the same magical source that explains all their other mysteries,   
   of course... things not   
   >alive assemble them selves into living things and out of absolute sterility   
   no less... develop   
   >complex physical systems and mental abilities and emotions... divide into   
   thousands upon thousands   
   >upon thousands of other complex living things... self invent morality... a   
   sense of right and   
   >wrong... divide itself into male and female... invent for itself intimacy...   
   even makes cartoons to   
   >prove it's point... and, these people call themselves ' scientists. '   
   >   
   >What to people believing this stuff call them selves ?   
   >   
   >There is no lack of a better explanation since life is not of this world.    
   Life belongs to the   
   >Living God and His science points only to Him as the Maker of all these   
   things.  A self created   
   >creation is not possible.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)