XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.athiesm, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
   From: me@nothere.biz   
      
   On 29-September-2014 11:03 AM, mur@.not. wrote:   
   > On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 18:09:13 -0500, Free Lunch  wrote:   
   > ..   
   >> On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 18:33:40 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:25:48 -0500, Free Lunch    
   wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:22:41 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2014 11:08:16 -0500, Free Lunch    
   wrote:   
   >>>>> .   
   >>>>>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2014 11:57:07 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:54:14 -0500, Free Lunch    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:47:16 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >>>>>> ...   
   >>>>>>>>>     "The gods of the theists who bother us here don't exist, even in   
   non-god   
   >>>>>>>>> form." - Free Lunch   
   >>>>>>>> The fact that we don't bother trying to decide of the entire set of   
   all   
   >>>>>>>> possible gods do or do not exist does not affect the fact that the   
   gods   
   >>>>>>>> preached by the theist fools who waste our time in alt.atheism do not   
   >>>>>>>> exist.   
   >>>>>>>     Present your evidence, not just the possibility you've put your   
   faith in.   
   >>>>>> Define your god for me so I can show you that your god does not exist.   
   >>>>>    To me the minimum would be a being not native to Earth that had   
   deliberate   
   >>>>> influence on the way life developed on this planet.   
   >>>> So your god is trivially unimportant.   
   >>>     Not compared to you, or me, or anyone else who has ever lived.   
   >> How so? Your god is one of those that is completely unsubstantiated and   
   >> meaningless.   
   >      We were discussing a definition, not the amount of proof of the actual   
   > existence or not of what is being defined.   
   >   
   >>>> Fine.   
   >>>     You damn sure can't do anything about it no matter what you say or try   
   to   
   >>> do.   
   >> I agree that I cannot turn you into a rational human. That is your   
   >> problem.   
   >      I consider the possibility that there is no God associated with Earth,   
   and   
   > the possibility that there is. I've also challenged many of you atheists, and   
   > probably you yourself, to try to explain why I should put my faith in the   
   first   
   > possibility being the correct one. Until one of you people finally manages to   
   > give some respectable reason(s) why I should put my faith in that first   
   > possibility being the correct ONE, it will continue to seem much more   
   rational   
   > to consider more than that one and not put faith in it.   
      
   They have no answer for this   
      
   --   
   rgds,   
      
   Pete   
   -------   
   It's not about Islam!.. http://ausnet.info/pics/islam.png   
   Islam is a religion of peace!.. http://thereligionofpeace.com   
   http://pamelageller.com/   
   “The future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam” -   
   Barack Hussein Obama   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)