XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.athiesm, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
   From: Dean"@gmail.com   
      
   On 9/28/2014 9:05 PM, mur@.not. wrote:   
   > On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 18:10:14 -0500, Free Lunch  wrote:   
   > .   
   >> On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 18:34:35 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On Wed, 03 Sep 2014 18:27:00 -0600, Uergil  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> In article , mur@.not.   
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> Most that I've encountered try to claim they have no belief. Not   
   believing   
   >>>>> any gods exist can mean having no belief, or it could mean believing no   
   gods   
   >>>>> exist. Even after making it clear they believe no gods exist many   
   atheists   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Most atheists only SUSPECT that no gods exist   
   >>>   
   >>>     No place(s) in the entire universe? Or just none associated with this   
   planet   
   >>> or star system?   
   >>   
   >> There are zero gods that are supported by evidence.   
   >   
   >      Try to explain WHAT sort of evidence you think there "should be", WHERE   
   you   
   > think it "should be", and WHY you think it "should be" to God's benefit for   
   him   
   > to provide us with it if he exists.   
   >   
   Science is materialist, thus limited and confined to natural occurrence   
   and natural entities made up of matter, thus the scientific method has   
   no capability to examine and study the unnatural; therefore there can be   
   no solid, empirical evidence for Deity, since Deity does not consist of   
   matter.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)