XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.athiesm, alt.talk.creationism
XPost: sci.skeptic
From: me@nothere.biz
On 07-October-2014 10:11 AM, Free Lunch wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 10:02:38 +1100, felix_unger wrote:
>
>> On 06-October-2014 12:14 AM, Free Lunch wrote:
>>> On Sun, 05 Oct 2014 12:25:36 +1100, felix_unger wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 29-September-2014 11:03 AM, mur@.not. wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 18:09:13 -0500, Free Lunch
wrote:
>>>>> ..
>>>>>> On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 18:33:40 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:25:48 -0500, Free Lunch
wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:22:41 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2014 11:08:16 -0500, Free Lunch wrote:
>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2014 11:57:07 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:54:14 -0500, Free Lunch wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:47:16 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "The gods of the theists who bother us here don't exist,
even in non-god
>>>>>>>>>>>>> form." - Free Lunch
>>>>>>>>>>>> The fact that we don't bother trying to decide of the entire set
of all
>>>>>>>>>>>> possible gods do or do not exist does not affect the fact that
the gods
>>>>>>>>>>>> preached by the theist fools who waste our time in alt.atheism do
not
>>>>>>>>>>>> exist.
>>>>>>>>>>> Present your evidence, not just the possibility you've put
your faith in.
>>>>>>>>>> Define your god for me so I can show you that your god does not
exist.
>>>>>>>>> To me the minimum would be a being not native to Earth that had
deliberate
>>>>>>>>> influence on the way life developed on this planet.
>>>>>>>> So your god is trivially unimportant.
>>>>>>> Not compared to you, or me, or anyone else who has ever lived.
>>>>>> How so? Your god is one of those that is completely unsubstantiated and
>>>>>> meaningless.
>>>>> We were discussing a definition, not the amount of proof of the
actual
>>>>> existence or not of what is being defined.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Fine.
>>>>>>> You damn sure can't do anything about it no matter what you say
or try to
>>>>>>> do.
>>>>>> I agree that I cannot turn you into a rational human. That is your
>>>>>> problem.
>>>>> I consider the possibility that there is no God associated with
Earth, and
>>>>> the possibility that there is. I've also challenged many of you
atheists, and
>>>>> probably you yourself, to try to explain why I should put my faith in
the first
>>>>> possibility being the correct one. Until one of you people finally
manages to
>>>>> give some respectable reason(s) why I should put my faith in that first
>>>>> possibility being the correct ONE, it will continue to seem much more
rational
>>>>> to consider more than that one and not put faith in it.
>>>> They have no answer for this
>>> Mur may or may not have a completely different definition of god from
>>> you, but he likes being coy about it. He doesn't tell you what he
>>> believes, merely that he has fun trying to bait others.
>> whatever. the point is that it makes more sense to allow all
>> possibilities rather than be committed to just one
> Why are you willing to believe the most absurd, evidence-free claims?
lol, that's funny coming from an atheist who has no evidence for his
no-god position.
--
rgds,
Pete
-------
It's not about Islam!.. http://ausnet.info/pics/islam.png
Islam is a religion of peace!.. http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://pamelageller.com/
“The future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam” -
Barack Hussein Obama
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
