XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.athiesm, alt.talk.creationism
XPost: sci.skeptic
From: Dean"@gmail.com
On 10/6/2014 7:49 PM, Free Lunch wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 18:27:42 -0400, "R.Dean" <"R. Dean"@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 9/28/2014 9:05 PM, mur@.not. wrote:
>>> On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 18:10:14 -0500, Free Lunch
wrote:
>>> .
>>>> On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 18:34:35 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 03 Sep 2014 18:27:00 -0600, Uergil wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article , mur@.not.
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Most that I've encountered try to claim they have no belief. Not
believing
>>>>>>> any gods exist can mean having no belief, or it could mean believing
no gods
>>>>>>> exist. Even after making it clear they believe no gods exist many
atheists
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Most atheists only SUSPECT that no gods exist
>>>>>
>>>>> No place(s) in the entire universe? Or just none associated with
this planet
>>>>> or star system?
>>>>
>>>> There are zero gods that are supported by evidence.
>>>
>>> Try to explain WHAT sort of evidence you think there "should be",
WHERE you
>>> think it "should be", and WHY you think it "should be" to God's benefit
for him
>>> to provide us with it if he exists.
>>>
>> Science is materialist, thus limited and confined to natural occurrence
>> and natural entities made up of matter, thus the scientific method has
>> no capability to examine and study the unnatural; therefore there can be
>> no solid, empirical evidence for Deity, since Deity does not consist of
>> matter.
>
> So you are objecting that science doesn't accept bullshit that people
> make up and attribute to some god or other.
>
I simply stated facts.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
