home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.flame.jesus.christ      But... wasn't he a carpenter?      88,286 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 87,669 of 88,286   
   Free Lunch to All   
   Re: Everyone knows NO Gods exist... even   
   07 Oct 14 20:12:22   
   
   XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.athiesm, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
   From: lunch@nofreelunch.us   
      
   On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 22:45:46 -0400, "R.Dean" <"R. Dean"@gmail.com>   
   wrote:   
      
   >On 10/6/2014 7:49 PM, Free Lunch wrote:   
   >> On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 18:27:42 -0400, "R.Dean" <"R. Dean"@gmail.com>   
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 9/28/2014 9:05 PM, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >>>> On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 18:10:14 -0500, Free Lunch    
   wrote:   
   >>>> .   
   >>>>> On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 18:34:35 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On Wed, 03 Sep 2014 18:27:00 -0600, Uergil  wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> In article , mur@.not.   
   >>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Most that I've encountered try to claim they have no belief. Not   
   believing   
   >>>>>>>> any gods exist can mean having no belief, or it could mean believing   
   no gods   
   >>>>>>>> exist. Even after making it clear they believe no gods exist many   
   atheists   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Most atheists only SUSPECT that no gods exist   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>      No place(s) in the entire universe? Or just none associated with   
   this planet   
   >>>>>> or star system?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> There are zero gods that are supported by evidence.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>       Try to explain WHAT sort of evidence you think there "should be",   
   WHERE you   
   >>>> think it "should be", and WHY you think it "should be" to God's benefit   
   for him   
   >>>> to provide us with it if he exists.   
   >>>>   
   >>> Science is materialist, thus limited and confined to natural occurrence   
   >>> and natural entities made up of matter, thus the scientific method has   
   >>> no capability to examine and study the unnatural; therefore there can be   
   >>> no solid, empirical evidence for Deity, since Deity does not consist of   
   >>> matter.   
   >>   
   >> So you are objecting that science doesn't accept bullshit that people   
   >> make up and attribute to some god or other.   
   >>   
   >I simply stated facts.   
      
   Religious claims are not facts.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca