XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.athiesm, alt.talk.creationism
XPost: sci.skeptic
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 00:37:56 +0200, Chicken Runz cowardly wussed:
.
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 15:48:44 -0400, Ralph wrote:
>On 10/20/2014 5:47 PM, mur.@.not. wrote:
>> On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 15:52:52 -0400, August Rode wrote:
>> .
>>> On 15/10/2014 1:25 PM, Chicken Runz wrote:
>>>> "August Rode" skrev i meddelelsen news:V4w%v.386241$Q61.13019@fx13.iad...
>>>>
>>>> (snip)
>>>>
>>>>> Excuse me?
>>>> (snip)
>>>>
>>>>> Dude, your spittle is coating the inside of my monitor. Stop. Take a
>>>>> breath. Calm yourself. *Then* try to say something coherent.
>>>> Don't get me wrong, but it has been rather amusing to follow your joust
>>>> with mur, and to see how you become more and more puzzled by the
>>>> responses you get from him.
>>> Are we certain he isn't some sort of 'bot? He seems to deal mostly in
>>> handwaving generalities.
>>>
>>>> I've been there myself, and I see that he is
>>>> still, months later, talking about atheists being ashamed
Which they clearly are.
>>>> and how
>>>> atheist should say what type of proof for God (the god associated with
>>>> Earth, that is) must be there.
Which they and YOU have clearly proven they and YOU have no clue at all
about.
>>>> Has he quoted Arthur C. Clarke yet?
>>> Yes, he has. I take it then that he has some kind of modus operandi.
Apppreciating the quote from Clarke is one of the basic starting lines that
none of you have been able to get as "far" as, yet I encourage you people to
try
because I'm curious if any of you could move on from there if you ever could.
>> There are basic starting lines atheists can't get as "far" as. I
encourage
>> them to try, and at least point them out for people, to see if any atheist
can
>> ever move on and get as "far" as any of the starting lines I point out for
them.
>> As yet none have been able to.
>>
>>> Are we sure he's not a 'bot?
>>>
>>>> If
>>>> you're the patient kind, I give you a few more days before you explode
>>>> and eventually kill file him.
>>> I'm not going to killfile him. At worst, I'll simply go back to ignoring
>>> his posts like I had been doing until a couple of days ago.
>> What finally got him to run and hide was that I challenged him
repeatedly
>> about his own claims in ways he couldn't deal with, and apparently still
can't.
>> After pointing out basic aspects like that God would pretty much have to be
a
>> very technologically advanced alien, and that given the size of the
universe it
>> seems more likely than not there are beings that can be considered Gods some
>> places in it, at some point he made the following claims:
>>
>> "Aaaaarrrrghhhhh! I have written, at least ten times, in various posts, that
>> I believe it is likely that there are very, very advanced creatures in the
>> universe with abilities that would seem miraculous and god-like to us. The
>> idea is not new to me. Why the hell do you claim that I believe the exact
>> opposite?" - Malte Runz
>>
>> "Don't you read what I actually write? God as an alien is NOT a new concept
>> to me. It's roughly 40 years since I first heard of Erich van Dänekin and
>> all that crap. Don't think you're ahead of me in that department." - Malte
Runz
>>
>> Yet he coud never put it all together:
>>
>> "I must insist that you distinguish between Biblical God and
>> Advanced Alien God." - Malte Runz
>>
>> When I continued to challenge him as to why, he apparently learned that he
has
>> no idea and finally ran away entirely because the cognitive dissonance it
>> created in his overly challenged mind was too much for him. He also could
never
>> say why he could imagine "god-like" beings associated with other planets,
yet
>> can't imagine such a thing happening in association with this one. Most
likely
>> when I pointed out the things I mentioned above in order to try to act like
he
>> was capable of appreciating such possibilities himself he parroted things he
>> heard other people say, about possibilities he has never actually been able
to
>> appreciate himself.
>>
>> He also made another absurd claim he could never attempt to back up:
>>
>> "I showed an example of evidence that proves god does not exist." - Malte
Runz
>>
>> He could never present the supposed evidence he boasted about. He finally
got
>> tired of trying to keep up the lies I challenged him about and gave up
entirely.
>> That seems most likely from my pov.
>
>
>Folks, if you wish to play with this fool, then by all means, do so.
>Generally, unless they provide comedic relief,
>I prefer to not waste a lot of time on them.
>So long, you god damn fool.
>
>Welcome to the club. I killfiled the wanker after a few weeks, for being
>just too dumb, too repetitive and, worst of all, utterly predicitve and
>hence booooring.
You GAVE UP trying to defeat me because I kicked your patheticly stupid ass
every time and all I had to do in order to do that was to challenge you to try
explaining YOUR OWN STUPIDITY.
>I only see his posts when others reply to them. I told him,
>before slamming the gates on him,
LOL!!!! Before running away like a cowardly crybaby because you could NOT
explain your own stupidity and you were humiliated by that FACT as you still
are, and being forced to face your own ineptitude causes cognitive dissonance
in
your overly challenged pathetic little mind.
>that he would never again get a reaction
>from me, and that's a promise I intend to keep.
That's because you know that any time you try to confront me you will have
your own stupidity clearly revealed. And THEN if you try to confront your own
stupidity somehow you will be revealed to be even MORE stupid. Here's an
obvious
clue for anyone who ever reads this:
People don't killfile people they think are too dumb and below them. Instead
they play with them and enjoy doing so. People ONLY killfile those who
consistently kick their ass and they know it because they've learned it the
hard
way, and when they pretend to boast that they'll never reply again they are
really letting everyone know that they're aware they were beaten entirely and
therefore will always remain afraid to confront that person any more.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
