XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.athiesm, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
   From: me@nothere.biz   
      
   On 01-November-2014 7:05 AM, The.W@tcher wrote:   
      
   > For years atheists have demanded what they call "evidence" of God's   
   existence,   
   > when what they really have been demanding is proof. When presented with   
   evidence   
   > of various types they dishonestly have denied the fact that it is evidence,   
   > enjoying the luxury of indulging themselves in their own blatant dishonesty.   
   > Their constant demand for proof which they dishonestly refer to as evidence   
   > makes it clear that they believe there should be some sort of proof of God's   
   > existence available to humans if he does indeed exist.   
      
   true!   
      
   >   
   > In the not too distant past atheists in these news groups have experienced   
   their   
   > complete and total ruination which they encountered due to the challenge   
   > presented to them by mur@.not The challenge was a simple one that they   
   should be   
   > able to address and overcome with ease, yet in reality none of them could   
   > address it at all much less overcome it. The challenge that defeated them so   
   > entirely was simply for them to try to explain what sort of "evidence" they   
   > think there should be, where they think it should be, and why they think God   
   > should make it available to humans if he does exist. That simple challenge   
   > resulted in their total ruination by exposing the fact that they don't have   
   the   
   > slightest idea what sort of proof God should provide us with, much less   
   where he   
   > should make it available. In the related followup thread "Why atheists are   
   > clueless about the evidence aspect." the resulting exposure of their   
   > cluelessness is examined and it's made clear that no one including the   
   atheists   
   > themselves can suggest why any such proof should be available to humans. That   
   > failure makes it clear that they have been extreme fools all these years for   
   > demanding something we now see there's no reason should be available for   
   them to   
   > be presented with.   
      
   yes, they cannot explain why there should be any proof   
      
   --   
   rgds,   
      
   Pete   
   -------   
   It's not about Islam!.. http://ausnet.info/pics/islam.png   
   Islam is a religion of peace!.. http://thereligionofpeace.com   
   http://pamelageller.com/   
   “The right to free speech includes the right to offend"   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)