XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.athiesm, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
   From: malte_runz@forgitit.dk   
      
   "Bob Casanova"  skrev i meddelelsen   
   news:oprc5a1ito4taguc3j971q5e913bi0ic3l@4ax.com...   
   >   
   > On Sun, 02 Nov 2014 23:32:20 +1100, the following appeared   
   > in sci.skeptic, posted by Sylvia Else   
   > :   
   >   
   > >On 1/11/2014 7:05 AM, The.W@tcher wrote:   
   >   
   > >> For years atheists have demanded what they call "evidence" of God's   
   > >> existence,   
   > >> when what they really have been demanding is proof. When presented with   
   > >> evidence   
   > >> of various types they dishonestly have denied the fact that it is   
   > >> evidence,   
   >   
   > >Care to list what you consider to be the evidence that's been presented?   
   >   
   > Any bets on whether it consists of a combination of   
   > religious texts, number of believers and arguments from   
   > incredulity?   
      
   Don't forget the 'many documented miracles'.   
      
   --   
   Malte Runz   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)