XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.athiesm, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
   From: lunch@nofreelunch.us   
      
   On Mon, 03 Nov 2014 19:35:17 -0500, mur.@.not. wrote:   
      
   >On Sat, 01 Nov 2014 09:11:56 +1100, felix_unger  wrote:   
   >.   
   >>On 01-November-2014 7:05 AM, The.W@tcher wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> For years atheists have demanded what they call "evidence" of God's   
   existence,   
   >>> when what they really have been demanding is proof. When presented with   
   evidence   
   >>> of various types they dishonestly have denied the fact that it is evidence,   
   >>> enjoying the luxury of indulging themselves in their own blatant   
   dishonesty.   
   >>> Their constant demand for proof which they dishonestly refer to as evidence   
   >>> makes it clear that they believe there should be some sort of proof of   
   God's   
   >>> existence available to humans if he does indeed exist.   
   >>   
   >>true!   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>> In the not too distant past atheists in these news groups have experienced   
   their   
   >>> complete and total ruination which they encountered due to the challenge   
   >>> presented to them by mur@.not The challenge was a simple one that they   
   should be   
   >>> able to address and overcome with ease, yet in reality none of them could   
   >>> address it at all much less overcome it. The challenge that defeated them   
   so   
   >>> entirely was simply for them to try to explain what sort of "evidence" they   
   >>> think there should be, where they think it should be, and why they think   
   God   
   >>> should make it available to humans if he does exist. That simple challenge   
   >>> resulted in their total ruination by exposing the fact that they don't   
   have the   
   >>> slightest idea what sort of proof God should provide us with, much less   
   where he   
   >>> should make it available. In the related followup thread "Why atheists are   
   >>> clueless about the evidence aspect." the resulting exposure of their   
   >>> cluelessness is examined and it's made clear that no one including the   
   atheists   
   >>> themselves can suggest why any such proof should be available to humans.   
   That   
   >>> failure makes it clear that they have been extreme fools all these years   
   for   
   >>> demanding something we now see there's no reason should be available for   
   them to   
   >>> be presented with.   
   >>   
   >>yes, they cannot explain why there should be any proof   
   >   
   >    Apparently they can't even make an attempt. They've certainly shown that   
   >they don't have any idea what they thought they were trying to talk about. It   
   >seems that they're now aware of their position since they don't try to defend   
   >themselves or their positon any more.   
      
   Go preach your religious nonsense elsewhere. You both know that you have   
   no evidence to support any claims about gods.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)