XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.athiesm, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
   From: me@nothere.biz   
      
   On 05-November-2014 12:57 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:   
      
   > On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 00:32:39 +0100, the following appeared in   
   > sci.skeptic, posted by "Malte Runz"   
   > :   
   >   
   >> "Bob Casanova"  skrev i meddelelsen   
   >> news:oprc5a1ito4taguc3j971q5e913bi0ic3l@4ax.com...   
   >>> On Sun, 02 Nov 2014 23:32:20 +1100, the following appeared   
   >>> in sci.skeptic, posted by Sylvia Else   
   >>> :   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 1/11/2014 7:05 AM, The.W@tcher wrote:   
   >>>>> For years atheists have demanded what they call "evidence" of God's   
   >>>>> existence,   
   >>>>> when what they really have been demanding is proof. When presented with   
   >>>>> evidence   
   >>>>> of various types they dishonestly have denied the fact that it is   
   >>>>> evidence,   
   >>>> Care to list what you consider to be the evidence that's been presented?   
   >>> Any bets on whether it consists of a combination of   
   >>> religious texts, number of believers and arguments from   
   >>> incredulity?   
   >> Don't forget the 'many documented miracles'.   
   > That, too.   
      
   what are miracles evidence of it not that a miraculous event has occurred?   
      
   --   
   rgds,   
      
   Pete   
   -------   
   It's not about Islam!.. http://ausnet.info/pics/islam.png   
   Islam is a religion of peace!.. http://thereligionofpeace.com   
   http://pamelageller.com/   
   “The right to free speech includes the right to offend"   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)