XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.athiesm, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
      
   On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 08:06:58 -0500, August Rode  wrote:   
   .   
   >On 04/11/2014 7:28 AM, felix_unger wrote:   
   >> On 04-November-2014 10:12 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 4/11/2014 9:58 PM, felix_unger wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> not when there are literally billions of people who consider they have   
   >>>> good reason(s) to believe. only ppl who want to deny the existence of   
   >>>> God try to claim that no evidence of God exists.   
   >>>   
   >>> That they believe is only evidence of their belief. It isn't evidence   
   >>> of the correctness of their belief.   
   >>   
   >> belief isn't evidence of belief. it's evidence for what is believed in.   
   >   
   >Millions of children believe in Santa Claus. Do you accept that as   
   >evidence that Santa exists?   
      
       The children believe in Santa because of the evidence their presented with.   
   That's a starting line. Can you get as "far" as the starting line with that   
   one,   
   or can't you even get that "far"?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)