XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.athiesm, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
   From: malte_runz@forgitit.dk   
      
   "Ralph"  skrev i meddelelsen   
   news:PeqdnUTIspqeNP_JnZ2dnUVZ5gGdnZ2d@giganews.com...   
      
   (snip)   
      
   > It is to you. In real life....not so much.   
      
   In a nutshell: If somebody believes in the existence of X, then that belief   
   in itself is evidence of the existence of X, according to felix_unger. The   
   argument is that nobody would believe in anything if there was no evidence.   
   And when billions believe in various gods, then that is very strong   
   evidence. I took it one step further and claimed that my belief, that gods   
   do not exist, therefor must be evidence for the non-existence of gods. Seems   
   pretty straight foreward, don't you think? But apparently I'm the stupid   
   one, with no common sense.   
      
   --   
   Malte Runz   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)