Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.flame.jesus.christ    |    But... wasn't he a carpenter?    |    88,286 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 87,863 of 88,286    |
|    felix_unger to Malte Runz    |
|    Re: Undeniable ruination of news group a    |
|    15 Nov 14 00:23:22    |
      XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.athiesm, alt.talk.creationism       XPost: sci.skeptic       From: me@nothere.biz              On 14-November-2014 10:45 PM, Malte Runz wrote:              > "felix_unger" skrev i meddelelsen       > news:ccm0piFgsiqU1@mid.individual.net...       >       > (snip)              you see, the trouble in trying to talk sense to atheists, is that they       have no sense. just stuck in their mindset rut, not able to see the       forest for the trees.              >       >>       >> I've concluded, following recent exchanges, that this guy is dishonest.       >       > There is nothing dishonest about saying that a story about a crippled       > hand being healed in 1858 doesn't cut it as evidence. There is nothing       > dishonest about saying that a 67 pixels out of focus grainy blob in       > photo is not evidence for anything, let alone alien spaceships. It's       > not dishonest to laugh at people who believe that medieval tales of       > Dog Heads is evidence of the existence of DH's.       >       > The dishonesty becomes apparent when you, who claim that everythining       > I just mentioned is indeed evidence,              I've told you over and over again what my position is. not my fault if       you can't/won't accept it. I posted this just yesterday, 13/11/14, which       you completely ignored:              ".. if you had any common sense, you would use it. firstly, we have to       consider ALL factors about anything to decide what the situation       actually is. belief CAN be evidence, as I will try to explain, but in       99.9% of cases belief is because of what evidence exists. In the case of       Christianity, the religion we are most familiar with in the West, apart       from Judaism, the beliefs are based on the bible and it's teaching, and       specifically the teachings of Jesus, and what is written about Jesus.       but we could then go on to say that the billions of christians are also       evidence, because if you (a person) had not heard of the bible, or       anything about Christianity, the fact that so many ppl believed       something would be evidence that there is something to believe in. and       when you take everything about Christianity into consideration.. ie. the       bible, the testimony of religious experiences, reports of miracles,       various texts and books, etc., that is all evidence for the existence of       the Christian God. likewise there is evidence for God (in general, if       you like), life, the universe, is evidence along with the literally       billions of ppl who believe in God in various ways. it's all just plain       common sense. ..."              > refuse to say whether you actually believe your own words or not.              and I've told you twice at least that what I believe, and the use of a       pseudonym, is immaterial to the validity of my arguments or any points I       make. and what did you do? you just snipped and ran.              >       >> when confronted with solid irrefutable argument or fact he just snips       >> and runs away. ...       >       > Do you believe that water from a well in France can heal people?       > Do you believe in miracles in general?       > Do you believe a grainy blob or a shaky video from 1954 is evidence of       > alien UFO's visting Earth?       > Do you believe that once Dog Heads lived in southern India?       > Do you believe that gods exist?              see above.              >       > You drag a tail of unanswered questions behind you that'd make       > Halley's Comet proud. But if you dare to answer those questions, and       > the ones to come, I'll consider picking up the debate again.       >       >       >> ... he doesn't have the decency to admit it when something that is       >> said it true. ...       >       > What truths?              like the fact that whether I disclose in a public forum what I       personally believe is irrelevant to the veracity of my arguments. like       the fact that you're too stupid to even suspect that a person might have       good reason(s) for not wanting to disclose their identity or beliefs.       like the fact that ppl may have good reasons to believe as they do. like       that fact that just because you don't accept as evidence what is clearly       evidence doesn't mean that it isn't. there is evidence for UFO's,       Nessie, and God. what do you suppose the Air force and NASA investigate       if not the evidence for UFO's and alien life forms to determine if they       exist or not? like the fact that that I don't have to prove that God,       Nessie, or UFO's exist to know that there is evidence for them. like the       fact that I don't have to defend any evidence for something and prove       that it proves anything, as you keep asking me to do, to know that it is       evidence. like the fact that you lie and misrepresent mine and murs       position from time to time, and even make contradictory remarks about       what you yourself believe as mur has quoted you on. like the fact that       you deny such truths, or snip and run with confronted with them. etc.,       etc., etc.,              > That a seventeen fingered hillbilly's belief in Big Foot must be       > considered valid evidence of Big Foots existence? You're the one       > running away every time I challenge you to defend your 'evidence'.       > You're the one who doesn't have the guts to pick one (1) specific       > example of what you call 'confirmed miracles' and defend it.       >       > So, 'felix', give me some of your truths and stick around to see me       > take them apart, or stop pretending that you're even trying.              see above comment              >       > (snip)       >       >                     --       rgds,              Pete       -------       It's not about Islam!.. http://ausnet.info/pics/islam.png       Islam is a religion of peace!.. http://thereligionofpeace.com       http://pamelageller.com/       “The right to free speech includes the right to offend"              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca