XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
      
   On Sat, 15 Nov 2014 14:21:04 +0100, Chicken Runz wrote:   
      
   >"felix_unger"  skrev i meddelelsen news:ccns2oF1jdgU1@mid.individual.net...   
   >>   
   >> On 15-November-2014 9:16 AM, Malte Runz wrote:   
   >>   
   >> > "felix_unger" skrev i meddelelsen   
   >> > news:ccme2nFkap4U1@mid.individual.net...   
   >   
   >(snip)   
   >   
   >> > And the Bible is evidence of God how exactly?   
   >>   
   >> because of what it contains. duh!   
   >   
   >And what it contains is words. Are you saying words are evidence? I got one   
   >of them for you: Hogwart   
   >   
   >>   
   >> > Because all the Christians believe so? (Please, please, please say   
   >> > 'yes'.)   
   >   
   >The words are evidence because many people believe they are true? Explain   
   >how words in a book can be regarded as evidence of the existence of what the   
   >words describe.   
   >   
   >> >   
   >> >> but we could then go on to say that the billions of christians are also   
   >> >> evidence, because if you (a person) had not heard of the bible, or   
   >> >> anything about Christianity, the fact that so many ppl believed   
   >> >> something would be evidence that there is something to believe in. ...   
   >> >   
   >> > And the Dog Heads?   
   >>   
   >> whatever evidence exists for dog heads is evidence for dog heads. duh! how   
   >> hard can this be!??   
   >   
   >Is a drawing of a Dog Head evidence of the existence of Dog Heads? Of course   
   >not.   
      
       And that has nothing to do with where it's located or when it was made or   
   who made it or anything? Is that true of all drawings ever made, and if not,   
   what determines whether your claim applies or not?   
      
   >Then what is? Eventually you'll have to admit that there is no valid   
   >evidence for their existence, and the only conclusion you can draw (if   
   >you're honest that is) is that there isn't any of gods either.   
      
       There's no reason why there should be any, much less is there any that   
   should be available to us, whether there's a God associated with Earth or not.   
   You don't seem able to comprehend that very significant though simple aspect of   
   the situation.   
      
   >(snip)   
   >   
   >> >   
   >> > I have spent thousands of words to attack the validity and merits of   
   >> > your 'evidence' and I do it again further down.   
   >>   
   >> and I have told you that I'm simply saying that evidence exists, not that   
   >> it proves anything   
   >   
   >This is more revealing of your mental capacity then you realize, I'm afraid.   
   >If something doesn't prove anything then it cannot be regarded as evidence.   
   >Why is this so difficult for you to accept?   
      
       Because it's a lie, and a stupid one.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)