Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.flame.jesus.christ    |    But... wasn't he a carpenter?    |    88,286 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 87,913 of 88,286    |
|    felix_unger to mur.@.not.    |
|    Re: Undeniable ruination of news group a    |
|    25 Nov 14 07:49:41    |
      XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism, alt.talk.creationism       XPost: sci.skeptic       From: me@nothere.biz              On 22-November-2014 1:28 PM, mur.@.not. wrote:              > On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:16:27 +0100, Chicken Runz wrote:       > ..       >> "felix_unger" skrev i meddelelsen news:ccq1s3Fj47oU1@mid.individual.net...       >>> On 16-November-2014 12:21 AM, Chicken Runz wrote:       >>>> "felix_unger" skrev i meddelelsen       >>>> news:ccns2oF1jdgU1@mid.individual.net...       >> (snip)       >>       >> For a while I thought fuck it, this is getting tiresome, and he'll call a       >> blob 'evidence of alien UFO's' no matter what. 'A miracle is evidence of God       >> even if we know that the miracle never happened.'       >>       >> But then I got pissed off again. That little piece of shite had actually       >> said this:       >>       >>>>>>> ... like the fact that you lie ...       >> You said that it is a fact that I'm a liar,       > Because you're a liar.       >       >> but you refused to back it up.       >> If it's "a fact" then you can prove it, right,       > I can:       >       > "I showed an example of evidence that proves god does not exist." - Malte       Runz       >       >> but you didn't even try. You       >> know what that makes you?       >>       >> You also said this about me:       >>       >>>>>>> make contradictory remarks about what you yourself believe ...       >> Again, you failed to back it up, which would be the easiest thing in the       >> world. Quote me, and make me look bad.       > You like to pretend you can consider this possibility which you've       proven       > that you can't:       >       > "Don't you read what I actually write? God as an alien is NOT a new concept       > to me. It's roughly 40 years since I first heard of Erich van Dänekin and       > all that crap. Don't think you're ahead of me in that department." - Malte       Runz       >       > You've also claimed:       >       > "Aaaaarrrrghhhhh! I have written, at least ten times, in various posts, that       > I believe it is likely that there are very, very advanced creatures in the       > universe with abilities that would seem miraculous and god-like to us. The       > idea is not new to me. Why the hell do you claim that I believe the exact       > opposite?" - Malte Runz       >       > yet you have never been able to explain how you want people to think you       think       > you disagree with yourself:       >       > "the utter lack of evidence is enough for me to believe that there are no       gods.       > Anywhere, anywhen." - Malte Runz       >       > "How many times do I need to write: "I believe no gods exist"" - Malte Runz       >       > You also dishonestly pretended you could appreciate the possibility of God       being       > a very advanced creature, but also showed that in reality the possibility is       > beyond your mental ability and you can't even think it through:       >       > "I must insist that you distinguish between Biblical God and       > Advanced Alien God." - Malte Runz       > .. . .       >> I could go into further details about all       >> the questions and replies that you have ignored.       > You've been challenged countless times to provide evidence that you       didn't       > lie blatantly when you claimed:       >       > "I showed an example of evidence that proves god does not exist." - Malte       Runz       >       > And ALL OF YOU have been challenged to try explaining WHAT evidence you think       > should be WHERE and WHY it should be available to humans when you make claims       > like:       >       > "If a god could interact with the physical world, there should be       > physical evidence thereof." - Malte Runz       >       > yet NONE OF YOU can even attempt to explain what you think you think.       >       >> But knowing you, as the       >> intellectual lazy coward you are, I realize that it'll yield nothing.       > Knowing the same is most especially true of you I still continue to       present       > challenges that defeat you entirely and continue proving you to be a horribly       > inept lazy coward yourself.       >       >>> I do appreciate your input, ...       >> And a slimy hypocrite as well.       > You're certainly displaying yourself as one.       >       >> Damn, I'm feeling a whole lot better now.       > LOL...there's no reason why you should.       >       >> Have a really shitty weekend!       > You have an even worse one, Chicken. You deserve it.              many thanks. I knew you could back up what I said. :)              --       rgds,              Pete       -------       It's not about Islam!.. http://ausnet.info/pics/islam.png       Islam is a religion of peace!.. http://thereligionofpeace.com       http://pamelageller.com/       http://www.barenakedislam.com/       "The right to free speech includes the right to offend"       "It's time to admit that we are not at war with terrorism.       We are at war with Islam" -Sam Harris       "ISIS's actions represent no faith, least of all the Muslim faith"       -Barack Obama, idiotic President of the USA              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca