XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
   From: malte_runz@forgitit.dk   
      
   "felix_unger"  skrev i meddelelsen news:ceaneuF9tgeU1@mid.individual.net...   
   >   
   > On 03-December-2014 10:43 PM, Malte Runz wrote:   
   (snip)   
      
   > >> ... and there's even an example above.. ...   
   > >   
   > > FINALLY!!! (Maybe there really is a god.) Lets have a look.   
   > >   
   > >> ... 'A miracle is evidence of God even if we know that the miracle   
   > >> never happened.' I've never said any such thing, nor would I, as it's a   
   > >> distortion of my position on the matter.   
   > >   
   > > This is what you wrote 05-11-2014:   
   > >   
   > > "the reports of miracles are evidence for the existence of God, whether   
   > > they occurred or not, ..."   
   >   
   > "reports" of miracles, you terminal moron!   
      
   Yes, "reports of miracles" That's what you wrote, that's what I quote and   
   use in my argument. Are you making a point here?   
      
      
   > > 'I heard about this miracle. Even if it turns out it didn't really   
   > > happen, I'll still say it's evidence of God'.   
   >   
   > cite. bet I never said it. that sounds like mur to me   
      
   I said it, 'paraphrasing' the above quote:   
      
   "the reports of miracles" = 'I heard about this miracle'   
      
   "whether they occurred or not" = 'Even if it turns out it didn't really   
   happen,'   
      
   "are evidence for the existence of God" = 'I'll still say it's evidence of   
   God'   
      
      
   Works fine, I'd say.   
      
      
   --   
   Malte Runz   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)