XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.athiesm, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
   From: lunch@nofreelunch.us   
      
   On Sat, 03 Jan 2015 10:14:47 -0700, Bob Casanova    
   wrote:   
      
   >On Fri, 02 Jan 2015 12:33:26 -0600, the following appeared   
   >in sci.skeptic, posted by Free Lunch :   
   >   
   >>On Fri, 02 Jan 2015 11:01:49 -0700, Virgil  wrote:   
   >   
   >>>In article ,   
   >>> Free Lunch  wrote:   
   >   
   >>>> All things that actually are obviously true can also be shown to be   
   >>>> true.   
   >   
   >>>That is a statement of faith, but not necessarily of fact!   
   >>>   
   >>>Unless  in addition to claiming it to be true you can prove it to be   
   >>>true!   
   >   
   >>Provide an example to show that I am wrong.   
   >   
   >Mathematical axioms, which generally cannot be proven even   
   >in principle, qualify, as does the assumption made by   
      
   Are mathematical axioms true or merely consistent with the model?   
      
   >science that physical laws are constant throughout the   
   >universe, which cannot be proven in practice even though it   
   >can in principle.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)