XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.athiesm, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
      
   On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 16:05:14 -0400, The.W@tcher wrote:   
      
   >For years atheists have demanded what they call "evidence" of God's existence,   
   >when what they really have been demanding is proof. When presented with   
   evidence   
   >of various types they dishonestly have denied the fact that it is evidence,   
   >enjoying the luxury of indulging themselves in their own blatant dishonesty.   
   >Their constant demand for proof which they dishonestly refer to as evidence   
   >makes it clear that they believe there should be some sort of proof of God's   
   >existence available to humans if he does indeed exist.   
   >   
   >In the not too distant past atheists in these news groups have experienced   
   their   
   >complete and total ruination which they encountered due to the challenge   
   >presented to them by mur@.not The challenge was a simple one that they should   
   be   
   >able to address and overcome with ease, yet in reality none of them could   
   >address it at all much less overcome it. The challenge that defeated them so   
   >entirely was simply for them to try to explain what sort of "evidence" they   
   >think there should be, where they think it should be, and why they think God   
   >should make it available to humans if he does exist. That simple challenge   
   >resulted in their total ruination by exposing the fact that they don't have   
   the   
   >slightest idea what sort of proof God should provide us with, much less where   
   he   
   >should make it available. In the related followup thread "Why atheists are   
   >clueless about the evidence aspect." the resulting exposure of their   
   >cluelessness is examined and it's made clear that no one including the   
   atheists   
   >themselves can suggest why any such proof should be available to humans. That   
   >failure makes it clear that they have been extreme fools all these years for   
   >demanding something we now see there's no reason should be available for them   
   to   
   >be presented with.   
      
   This is to make note of the fact that since posting this observation these news   
   group atheists are _still_  (10/31/14 - 1/09/15)  in undeniable ruination, the   
   simple challenge referred to above having brought about their complete and   
   total   
   defeat in ever sense of the word.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)