XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
      
   On Thu, 05 Feb 2015 16:46:56 -0800, Jeanne Douglas    
   wrote:   
   .   
   >In article , mur wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Mon, 02 Feb 2015 03:43:54 -0800, Jeanne Douglas    
   >> wrote:   
   >> .   
   >> >In article <0qrqcalc1ofgv7gemh395qn40u3tofeiro@4ax.com>, mur wrote:   
   >> >   
   >> >> On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 22:25:02 -0800, Jeanne Douglas   
   >> >>    
   >> >> wrote:   
   >> >> .   
   >> >> >On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 13:45:42 -0500, mur wrote:   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >>On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 23:28:47 -0700, Wisely Non-Theist    
   >> >> >>wrote:   
   >> >> >>.   
   >> >> >>>In article ,   
   >> >> >>> felix_unger  wrote:   
   >> >> >>>   
   >> >> >>>> it takes faith to believe that God does not   
   >> >> >>>> exist   
   >> >> >>>   
   >> >> >>>Perhaps it does may faith to disbelieve in what a person has once   
   >> >> >>>believed in,   
   >> >> >>   
   >> >> >>    To disbelieve can mean to have no belief at all, but it can also   
   >> >> >>    mean   
   >> >> >>    to   
   >> >> >>believe something is incorrect. That is very unfortunate imo, and   
   >> >> >>possibly   
   >> >> >>the   
   >> >> >>cause of some honest confustion...POSSIBLY.   
   >> >> >>   
   >> >> >>>but it takes no such faith not to believe in something one   
   >> >> >>>never has believed in.   
   >> >> >>   
   >> >> >>    To honestly have no belief requires considering the possibility   
   that   
   >> >> >>something is correct as well as that it's not correct. You make it   
   >> >> >>clearly   
   >> >> >>obvious you can consider the possibility that God does not exist as   
   >> >> >>being   
   >> >> >>correct. Try to present some evidence that you can also consider the   
   >> >> >>possibility   
   >> >> >>that God does exist as being correct, if you really would like to try   
   >> >> >>pretending   
   >> >> >>you honestly have no belief about it.   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >Why?   
   >> >>   
   >> >>     Because unless you do it will remain clear that the only belief   
   you're   
   >> >> capable of considering is the one but not any others. If you want to try   
   >> >> pretending you "have" no belief then you need to show that you can   
   >> >> consider   
   >> >> more   
   >> >> than just the ONE we know you DO consider.   
   >> >   
   >> >Care to translate that gibberish into English?   
   >>   
   >>     You can't do what I challenged you to do as I suspected, so you proved   
   me   
   >> correct. You've apparently served your purpose as well and clearly as you   
   are   
   >> able to.   
   >   
   >   
   >Now you have 2 pieces of word salad to translate into English. When can   
   >I expect your translation?   
      
       If you can't figure out what I meant then you just can't comprehend because   
   you're not mentally capable, and the concept will always remain beyond your   
   mental ability regardless of how it's presented to you.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)