XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism, alt.talk.creationism
XPost: sci.skeptic
On Sat, 07 Mar 2015 10:53:21 -0700, Bob Casanova wrote:
>On Sat, 7 Mar 2015 14:18:52 +0100, the following appeared in
>sci.skeptic, posted by "Malte Runz"
>:
>
>>"Free Lunch" skrev i meddelelsen
>>news:b6njfathn04nscpufrfvf03s9bf4312ok1@4ax.com...
>>
>>(snip)
>>
>>> I'm sure you have never presented any evidence that any deities exist.
>>> If you imagine you have, please repost it or post references to other
>>> evidence.
>>
>>Oh shit, now you've dunnit. He'll tell you that the Bible itself is
>>evidence, the fact that billions believe is evidence and all the confirmed
>>miracles are evidence. The are a few more but I can't be bothered to find
>>the complete list he has posted several times. You get my drift, though.
Life itself is evidence. All accepted miracles are evidence. All miracles
recorded in the Bible are evidence. All saints are evidence. Atheists are
evidence. All medical miracles are evidence. All prayers that seem to have been
answered are evidence. Death experiences people have and recover from are
evidence.
>I think you covered it.
>
>>> >>and offer a meaningless
>>> >>word salad in place of an answer.
>>> >
>>> > I pointed out aspects of the position WE ALL are in that you're not
>>> > able to
>>> >comprehend much less appreciate...LOL...which is why it's "meaningless"
>>> >to you.
>>>
>>> You seem to be here just to act silly.
>>
>>Actually, I believe his agenda is to get us to act silly by trying to engage
>>in dialogue with him.
>
>The "Never wrestle with a pig" aphorism seems appropriate...
Explain how you like to think the same thing doesn't apply from my position
in regards to you atheists.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
