d888bce8   
   XPost: talk.politics.crypto, alt.politics.howard-dean, alt.flame.rednecks   
      
   On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 11:51:59 -0700 (PDT), Ann Coulter   
    wrote:   
      
   Note: The only time I call people "niggers" is when they treat me to   
   vulgar language. Act like a "low down and ugly person" (as defined in   
   Webster's Dictionary around 1978) and be called one. Nothing to do   
   with skin color, everything to do with character.   
      
      
      
   >On Jul 17, 2:42 pm, Richard Steel  wrote:   
   >> On Jul 17, 11:32 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> > On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 07:43:32 -0700 (PDT), Richard Steel   
   >>   
   >> >  wrote:   
   >> > >On Jul 17, 7:27 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:   
   >> > >> On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 23:19:26 -0700 (PDT), Richard Steel   
   >>   
   >> > >>  wrote:   
   >> > >> >> >So, you simply deleted my proof, and repeated your lie. Yougart's   
   >> > >> >> >SOP.   
   >>   
   >> > >> >> Your "proof" has no validity.   
   >>   
   >> > >> >You want to believe 80% of Americans are chomping at the bit for   
   >> > >> >higher taxes?  Knock yourself out, asswipe.   
   >> > >> No, your claim has no valid basis stated as such   
   >> > >Again, you want to believe this nonsense?   
   >> > I'm not as easily swayed   
   >>   
   >> ...by facts?  Yeah, I know.   
   >   
   >When are the Republican Congress going to speed up the economy and   
   >create jobs instead of sitting on their sanctimonious fat butts and   
   >jerking off?   
   >   
   >The only reason why Texas has slightly higher employment is because   
   >sucking dick for $2.50 an hour is essential the the right to work   
   >state.   
   >   
   >   
   >It should be remembered that conservatives expressed no interest or   
   >concern whatsoever about spending, debt or deficits until Obama was   
   >sworn in. Almost immediately following the swearing in, they were   
   >wailing and gnashing their teeth, up to their butts in ashes and   
   >sackcloth over all this spending and all these taxes that they hadn't   
   >given a rat's ass about two months previously, because they apparently   
   >had no memory of who was in charge when all that money had been spent.   
   >Speaking of amnesia, the bailouts were the Bush administration's baby,   
   >not Obama's, even though brain dead right wingers continue to blame   
   >Obama's "socialism" for them with their usual disregard for the facts.   
   >Also, dozens of government sponsored cash for trash programs for   
   >incompetent bankers, TARP and another trillion in "off budget"   
   >military costs that came back "on budget" almost immediately after   
   >Obama was sworn in were also Bush's. Continuing Bush's monstrously   
   >expensive Platinum Series Tax Cuts is another fiscal belly buster that   
   >will be paid for out of Grandma's Social Security, if John Boehner and   
   >that god awful Mitch McConnell have anything to say about it. So   
   >there's about four trillion in "Obama's" spending that really wasn't   
   >Obama's spending at all in the real, non Fox "news" world. Then you've   
   >got your trillion dollar "prescription drug benefit" that benefits   
   >only drug manufacturers, about another trillion when those Platinum   
   >Series tax cuts go permanent and another trillion or so in defense   
   >spending every year.   
   >   
   >And the only way to pay for it all is to kill NPR, PBS and Planned   
   >Parenthood. Let me know how that works out for you redistributionist,   
   >johnny come lately deficit hawks.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)