From: kingkong@iglou.com   
      
   "Right Wing Homosexual Pedophile Mike Flannigan"    
   wrote in message news:jskprv$bsv$1@speranza.aioe.org   
   > Snow In Winter = No Global Warming According To Retarded Right Wing   
   > Public   
   > School Drop Outs   
   >   
   > The facts about the mentally insane mindless retards who promote the   
   > myth of   
   > climate change denial:   
   >   
   > Low intellegence, religious delusions and blind adherance to radical   
   > right   
   > wing ideology is the only thread linking the handful of radical right   
   > wing   
   > lunatics who still maintain that the earth is flat or climate change   
   > is a   
   > great socialist conspiracy by the Jews.   
   >   
   > Insane, anti-science radical right wing foaming at the mouth bozos   
   > erupt   
   > in spastic frenzy's as they claim that science is not really science,   
   > but   
   > religion and that "real" science should eminate from the minds of   
   > right wing politicians, unqualified charlatans, energy industry   
   > shills and former tobacco industry PR men.   Most of the deniers are   
   > pin heads who don't understand basic science.  They frequently   
   > confuse weather with climate and constantly repeat lies, no matter   
   > how many times they have been debunked with facts refuting them.   
   >   
   > Few of the deniers have jobs, they sit around all day at their   
   > computers   
   > jibber jabbering with each other on Usenet swapping the same insane   
   > lies.   
   >   
   > Drooling, SubHuman Rightist Apes Are Not Intelligent Enough To Grasp   
   > Science.   Rightists worship politicians who are beholden to big oil   
   > and   
   > big coal and will even kiss Muslim ass by fighting sustainable   
   > alternatives.   
   >   
   > Rightists fail to possess the gene that allows humans citical analysis   
   > and   
   > like good slaves, simply do as they are told and parrot what they are   
   > ordered to parrot.   
   >   
   > That's what happens when all you're qualified to do is push broom like   
   > all   
   > the other "right wing bloggers who claim to be climate experts". They   
   > were   
   > probably a 9/11 conspiracy kooks or one of those idiots who think that   
   > the   
   > lunar landings were a lie, vaccinations are a government experiment,   
   > there   
   > were WMD's in Iraq and tobacco has no link to cancer!   
   >   
   > Most right wing retards believe that it's a big socialist cabal under   
   > Al   
   > Gore.  And when you point out that most major corporations are   
   > endeavoring   
   > to reduce their GHG emissions or the insurance industry (who most   
   > deniers   
   > strongly endorse in US health care) they start yammering on about how   
   > they're in on the great conspiracy as well.   
   >   
   > Then they continue to cite fabrications from dubious, amateur websites   
   > like "c3headlines", anonymous uncredentialed bloggers, crackpots,   
   > right wing think tanks and retired scientists turned fossil fuel   
   > industry shills   
   > for their "facts".   
   >   
   > Even more hilarious, the majority of the scientists they cite never   
   > worked   
   > in the field of climatology in the first place, so it's like citing   
   > the opinion of your dentist for a heart condition.   
   >   
   > Most of these idiots don't even go outside because they're so mentally   
   > unstable.   
   >   
   > Most Rightists aren't intelligent enough to be scientists, making them   
   > gullible and easily duped by snake oil salesmen.   
   >   
   > Only Six Percent Of Scientists Are Republicans: Pew Poll   
   >   
   > A new study by the Pew Research Center finds that the GOP is   
   > alienating scientists to a startling degree.   
   >   
   > Only six percent of America's scientists identify themselves as   
   > Republicans; fifty-five percent call themselves Democrats. By   
   > comparison, 23 percent of the overall public considers itself   
   > Republican, while 35 percent say they're Democrats.   
   >   
   > The ideological discrepancies were similar. Nine percent of scientists   
   > said they were "conservative" while 52 percent described themselves as   
   > "liberal," and 14 percent "very liberal." The corresponding figures   
   > for the general public were 37, 20 and 5 percent.   
   >   
   > Among the general public, moderates and independents ranked higher   
   > than any party or ideology. But among scientists, there were   
   > considerably more Democrats (55%) than independents (32%) and   
   > Republicans (6%) put together. There were also more liberals (52%)   
   > than moderates (35%) and conservatives (9%) combined.   
   >   
   > "These results were not a complete surprise," said Scott Keeter,   
   > Director of Survey Research at Pew, in an interview with the   
   > Huffington Post. He said they can be mostly attributed to "the   
   > difference between Democratic and Republican parties with respect to   
   > issues."   
   >   
   > The wide ideological and partisan gap among scientists may have been   
   > exacerbated by the Bush administration, which often disputed broad   
   > scientific consensus on topics such as evolution and climate change.   
   >   
   > Keeter acknowledged this factor, but said that "many of these disputes   
   > probably predate the Bush administration," noting that scientists have   
   > favored liberal views in numerous past studies.   
   >   
   > Religion also plays a role. Republicans tend to promote the centrality   
   > of religion more often than Democrats, and while 95 percent of the   
   > public said they believe in "God" or "a higher power," only 51 percent   
   > of scientists claimed either.   
   >   
   > "Many Republicans, especially the Evangelical wing of the party, are   
   > skeptical of evolution, and have argued for the teaching of   
   > creationism and intelligent design in school," said Keeter.   
   >   
   > The results could merely be a reflection of how scientists see the   
   > world, rather than of partisan loyalties. In a series of questions   
   > posed, the study found that the answers of scientists were   
   > consistently more in line with liberal viewpoints than those of the   
   > general public.   
   >   
   > "The Republican Party has a number of leaders within it who have   
   > challenged the accuracy of scientific findings on issues such as   
   > climate change, evolution and stem cell research," Keeter told the   
   > Huffington Post.   
   >   
   > "It suggests that scientists who are Republicans might feel some   
   > dissonance from the party's position on some things that are important   
   > to them. And while there are Republicans in the scientist sample,   
   > there are really not that many," he said.   
   >   
   > ----   
   >   
   > Expert credibility in climate change   
   >   
   >   1. William R. L. Anderegga,1,   
   >   2. James W. Prallb,   
   >   3. Jacob Haroldc, and   
   >   4. Stephen H. Schneidera,d,1   
   >   
   > Abstract   
   >   
   > Although preliminary estimates from published literature and expert   
   > surveys suggest striking agreement among climate scientists on the   
   > tenets   
   > of anthropogenic climate change (ACC), the American public expresses   
   > substantial doubt about both the anthropogenic cause and the level of   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)