XPost: alt.christnet.second-coming.real-soon-now, alt.religion.c   
   ristian.last-days   
   From: none@none.com   
      
   On 11/18/2010 4:30 PM, T. D. Comeau wrote:   
   > Or are you one of the slaves who does it for free?   
   >   
   > Thank you for proving that it's all about the politics and not about the   
   > science to you.   
      
   I question the purity of the data.  I'm not convinced that the data   
   collection stations are free of bias, and I'm not convinced that the   
   data aggregators and manipulators are free of bias either.  That is   
   sufficient for me to raise questions about any conclusions based on   
   (actual) temperature data.   
      
   I question the ability to discern historical temperatures from proxies.   
     I find it quite disturbing that the recent temperatures to NOT   
   correspond with recent proxy records.  To me, that singly disqualifies   
   historical proxy data and/or calls into serious question those that   
   promulgate proxy data as de facto standard.   
      
   I question the relatively few that are in key positions and control   
   access to the data and manipulation routines.  I find it disturbing that   
   such proclamations demanding public response are based on obscure or   
   publicly unavailable methods, processes, and procedures.   
      
   In my studies and analysis of the situation, I see warming occurring   
   (based on GISS/manipulated data, so presuming that it /is/ occurring)   
   for the past 30 years ONLY.  Not 150.  This, in my opinion, undermines   
   major theses of those that attempt to correlate and justify cause on   
   industrial revolution CO2.   
      
   Have a nice day.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)