XPost: alt.christnet.second-coming.real-soon-now, alt.religion.c   
   ristian.last-days   
   From: screw_me@bush.net   
      
   "Shriekback" wrote in message   
   news:Xns9E3A61FA65FC34466gfdsfs@94.75.214.39...   
   > And they blame Obama for it!   
   >   
   > Every legitimate and decent institutions of our world can vouch for   
   > you on what Christian teaches and what were their basic doctrines.   
   > Unless you posture yourself as an enemy of the Christian Faith,   
   > therefore one need to pervert their truths, and indulges in deeds of   
   > deceits and dishonor in order to make the Christians look bad.   
   >   
   > For thousands of years intellectuals found no fault in the records of   
   > Moses, or ever complained of their past atrocities, not until a breed   
   > of new slanderers came upon the public scene.   
   >   
   > The accounts of Moses contained atrocities, and also implied spiritual   
   > forces at work against the Israelites. The Bible speaks of the Devils'   
   > atrocities and deceptions and yet attackers of the Bible just pretend   
   > that aspect, the works of the devil, again and again.   
   >   
   > It was written, for this cause that Jesus was manifested in the flesh   
   > so that He might destroy the works of the Devils.   
   >   
   > Is God being ruthless to demand enemies of Israel to be killed, and   
   > even by not letting little kids go? Was the battle instructions God   
   > gave to Moses harsh and unrealistic? Every military strategists and   
   > Historians understood perfectly well, and can easily justify the   
   > actions of Moses and his soldiers but not for the distorter of the   
   > scriptures.   
   >   
   > One of the strangest attacks by some intellectuals who had made   
   > against God was: how could God be so ruthless against Israel's   
   > enemies, and even had rules so tough for His own people?   
   >   
   > By acknowledging the person God, meaning He is wise, clever and is the   
   > Creator,so would any rational intellectual dispute His ways and   
   > instructions? If it is God's instruction then no one should have any   
   > dispute, but contrarily if it is fallible man's idea, then we surely   
   > have something to gripe upon.   
   >   
   > It took many generations of war for the Chinese to realize that   
   > enemies' children must also be killed, lest when he/she grows up, they   
   > will take revenge. Taking the spoils of war, be it their women or   
   > properties were right and sane.Otherwise, let there be no war.   
   >   
   > In fact, an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth, the balance   
   > approach where countries made that as a principle are still a   
   > practice.   
   >   
   > In the heat of war of words, Chinese generals made clear to Taiwan   
   > that their Liberation Army were all prepared to attack, and such   
   > decision were made. The Taiwanese made good promises that their   
   > missiles will all reach Hongkong, for she is vulnerable, HK and Macau   
   > are defenseless. It became stalemate and Taiwan was saved.   
   >   
   > The Human rights club, the Peace activities and the Islamic world had   
   > been advocating certain kind of doctrines for USA such as never seen   
   > before.   
   >   
   > Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton were fooled. We saw Black Hawk down.   
   > Attacks after attacks against US soldiers and people continue unabated   
   > by the Islamic world.Today, they claimed superiority of their   
   > religion, and urge UN to pass Laws to favor only their Faith as   
   > supreme-criminalizing those who criticized their religion.   
   >   
   > The voices from them to American, and they advocate USA to play   
   > sitting ducks, and to lie down and lie low, be the victim for the   
   > rapists, so to speak.   
   >   
   > Americans, then actually obliged. It was Bush who refused to listen to   
   > world opinion, refused to allow Americans as sitting ducks which cause   
   > the world to hate him and USA.   
   >   
   > Today,Obama goes around apologizing for USA,bowing as low as possible,   
   > in a kind of humble postures, thus gaining world recognition and so-   
   > called respect.I, too can gets lot of praise from the atheists' nuts   
   > by compromising with them and agreeing with them,using soothing words   
   > of deceits.   
   >   
   > Is that being true to one own principle?   
   >   
   > The voices of the Islamic nation,(OIC) which spoke so loudly cursing   
   > the Western civilization, are getting Ovations and recognitions. While   
   > decent folks saw their deeds as a proof of their evilness, they   
   > themselves saw their intimidation against civilized people as   
   > legitimate.   
   >   
   > How come our world celebrates weak leaders in the face of crude   
   > realities and terrorism?It surely is a puzzle.   
   >   
   > Did Americans get the spoil of war in Iraq? The Oil? Why USA liberates   
   > oppressed people of Iraq and Afghanistan and then turn her wealth and   
   > properties to them in turn gets rebuff and hatred by the International   
   > community?   
   >   
   > Bush spends untold billions and blood to reconstruct a nation for   
   > them, support financially and manpower for the largest part of Africa,   
   > fighting diseases and yet he receives no praise from the International   
   > community?   
   >   
   > Instead it was Obama who was being praise and even got the Nobel   
   > Prize, for doing nothing.   
   >   
   > Mindless nonsense was hurl at my messages. The atheistic mindsets   
   > believe that by acting obnoxious, using foul languages, ridicules and   
   > vulgarities; pretend to be wise so no one would be able to identify   
   > them as crooks and fruitcakes.   
   >   
   > It doesn't take intelligence to glimpse at their self gloating chit-   
   > chat, self congratulatory triumph, to understand their abysmal   
   > handicap sanity. While they supposed their disdain look at others   
   > meant superiority, but to the contrary, their own creditability are at   
   > stakes.   
   >   
   > Evolution Theory and Creationism debates allow us to understand the   
   > former actually really has no legs to stand. Who gave a more plausible   
   > explanation of the truths of God? The Atheist or the Christians? Can   
   > one discern which is which, if anyone abides by the objectivity   
   > principle? Human depravity blinds discernment.   
   >   
   > The Human Global Warming fraud discovered recently (few days ago) by   
   > some folks, with insurmountable evidence, only goes to show our   
   > judgment were right all along. Why so many decades were people being   
   > subjected to those lies? Will we be able to see apologies after   
   > apologies by proponents of Global warmings, from political leaders to   
   > junk scientists, to shamed Journalists from all over the world? Do you   
   > think Al Gore would apologies on his errors?   
   >   
   > Evolution Theory already was found to be a junk science, and it is a   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|