home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.flame.rush-limbaugh      Those who hate 'em can't stop listening      18,602 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 17,690 of 18,602   
   Peter Franks to All   
   Re: Is The Religion Of Science Blastphem   
   03 Dec 10 07:06:42   
   
   XPost: alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, alt.flame.rednecks   
   From: none@none.com   
      
   On 12/3/2010 5:00 AM, CB wrote:   
   > In the good old days, 50 million years ago, the arctic was warm and a   
   > place where familys vacationed, riding their dinosaurs to and fro.   
   >   
   > nd everything was fine.    If you got sick, you went to the barber for   
   > some mercury and a good bleeding.   No expensive doctors in those days,   
   > and no government soicalist health care.   
   >   
   >   
   > When the lights went out, you lit another candle and didn't need to worry   
   > about fangled gizmos like light bulbs.   Law abiding people were in bed by   
   > sundown because there was nothing to do at night and cows to milk in the   
   > morning.   
   >   
   > If you ask me, everything went to the shitter during the Age of   
   > Enligtenment when the Progressives took over and made life intolerable.   
   > Kinda just like when Obama seized the White House and got rid of Bush.   
   >   
   > Evolutionists And Global Warming Alarmists are cranks who invented a myth   
   > that they call "Science."   
   >   
   > Here. Allow me to prove it:   
   >   
   > Suppose I claimed there was a dinosuar on my front   
   > step right now. No, not an image of a dinosaur, or any   
   > kind toy/depiction, but a real live dinosaur standing   
   > on my front step.   
   >   
   > Well, maybe not entirely. My front step isn't very large,   
   > but this real live dinosaur is certaily within the vicinity   
   > of my front step.   
   >   
   > What could you say here to disprove me?   
      
   Actually, according to the scientific model, it remains with you, the   
   person positing the statement to (attempt) to prove the statement wrong.   
     You then publish your findings with either substantiate or negate your   
   claim -- that forms the basis of conclusion.   
      
   Secondly, the scientific model assumes that the motivation behind the   
   statement (hypothesis) is the search for truth.  ANY OTHER motivation   
   compromises the integrity of the experiment and renders it either   
   suspect or void.   
      
   The simple act of making a "claim" has nothing to do with science.  So,   
   if you want to talk about scientific theory/model, go about it the right   
   way.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca