Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.flame.rush-limbaugh    |    Those who hate 'em can't stop listening    |    18,602 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 17,690 of 18,602    |
|    Peter Franks to All    |
|    Re: Is The Religion Of Science Blastphem    |
|    03 Dec 10 07:06:42    |
      XPost: alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, alt.flame.rednecks       From: none@none.com              On 12/3/2010 5:00 AM, CB wrote:       > In the good old days, 50 million years ago, the arctic was warm and a       > place where familys vacationed, riding their dinosaurs to and fro.       >       > nd everything was fine. If you got sick, you went to the barber for       > some mercury and a good bleeding. No expensive doctors in those days,       > and no government soicalist health care.       >       >       > When the lights went out, you lit another candle and didn't need to worry       > about fangled gizmos like light bulbs. Law abiding people were in bed by       > sundown because there was nothing to do at night and cows to milk in the       > morning.       >       > If you ask me, everything went to the shitter during the Age of       > Enligtenment when the Progressives took over and made life intolerable.       > Kinda just like when Obama seized the White House and got rid of Bush.       >       > Evolutionists And Global Warming Alarmists are cranks who invented a myth       > that they call "Science."       >       > Here. Allow me to prove it:       >       > Suppose I claimed there was a dinosuar on my front       > step right now. No, not an image of a dinosaur, or any       > kind toy/depiction, but a real live dinosaur standing       > on my front step.       >       > Well, maybe not entirely. My front step isn't very large,       > but this real live dinosaur is certaily within the vicinity       > of my front step.       >       > What could you say here to disprove me?              Actually, according to the scientific model, it remains with you, the       person positing the statement to (attempt) to prove the statement wrong.        You then publish your findings with either substantiate or negate your       claim -- that forms the basis of conclusion.              Secondly, the scientific model assumes that the motivation behind the       statement (hypothesis) is the search for truth. ANY OTHER motivation       compromises the integrity of the experiment and renders it either       suspect or void.              The simple act of making a "claim" has nothing to do with science. So,       if you want to talk about scientific theory/model, go about it the right       way.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca