Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.flame.rush-limbaugh    |    Those who hate 'em can't stop listening    |    18,602 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 17,868 of 18,602    |
|    Jerry Okamura to All    |
|    Re: Stern: Climate change deniers are Me    |
|    03 Apr 11 05:30:23    |
      XPost: talk.politics.crypto, alt.flame.rednecks, alt.flame.right       wing-conservatives       From: okamuraj005@hawaii.rr.com              If you believe in the Global Warming Theory, what should be done to prevent       the event from happening? Can you prevent the event from happening when not       all countries are doing their share?              "Edwin" wrote in message news:Xns9EBC2CD8E678chang@194.177.98.144...              I notice most of you idiots can't even hold down a job, you live off the       avails of working taxpayers.              Stern: Climate change deniers are 'flat-earthers'              Economist Nicholas Stern warns of 'absolute lunacy' of do-nothing approach       of Czech president Václav Klaus and fellow climate change sceptics                     Climate change deniers are "ridiculous" and akin to "flat-earthers",       according to Sir Nicholas Stern, who advised the government about the       economic threat posed by global warming. The respected economist compared       climate naysayers to those who deny the link between smoking and cancer or       HIV and Aids in the face of mounting scientific evidence.              Stern — who prepared his influential report to the UK Treasury in 2007 at       Gordon Brown's request — said the evidence that human-induced climate       change was occurring was "crystal clear".              "If you look at all the serious scientists in the world, there is no big       disagreement on the basics of this ... it would be absolute lunacy to act       as if climate change is not occurring," he said.              His comments came in response to news that the Czech president Václav       Klaus would this week attend a New York conference of climate change       naysayers from around the world. Stern said Klaus was "totally confused on       this issue" and liked to "gather rather confused people around him".              The US-based Heartland Institute, which had been funded by Exxon Mobil       until 2006, launched its gathering of more than 70 participants in an       event entitled 'Global warming: Was it ever really a crisis?'              Lord Stern addressed a large conference in London yesterday, organised by       the Department for International Development, where he said the battle       against poverty and the management of climate change were the "two great       challenges of the 21st century ".              "We know that greenhouse gases are rising. And we know the [global]       temperature is rising. We can look back through ice-core data and see over       800,000 years, relationships between carbon dioxide and the temperature of       the world," he told the Guardian.              "So those people who deny the importance of climate change are just       wasting their time. They're also being diversionary because if we don't       act the risks are enormous."              Asked if the public debate on the issue was being won, he said: "Those who       say that climate change doesn't exist are being understood as the       flat-earthers that they are, as the people who deny the link between       smoking and cancer, as the people who denied the link between HIV and       AIDS.              "They are marginal and they are ridiculous. And they are very confused."              He admitted that while some time still had to be spent dealing with "the       silly arguments that [deniers] put", discussions around the world had       moved on and were focused on the details of "reducing emissions and       managing the impact of climate change".              His comments will be bolstered this week by President Barack Obama's       directive that American government agencies should pick advisers based on       expertise, not political ideology. The move was hailed by scientists who       felt the previous administration had filled agencies with supporters who       shared George Bush's scepticism about climate change.              In 2007 a US committee on oversight and government reform published a       report documenting systematic efforts "to censor climate scientists by       controlling their access to the press and editing testimony to Congress"       by the Bush administration.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca