9745c57c
XPost: alt.flame.rednecks, alt.flame.cycle-sluts, alt.stupidity
XPost: rec.arts.dance
From: trdell1234@gmail.com
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:27:28 -0800 (PST), Murray Walker
wrote:
>MattB wrote:
>> On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:13:28 -0800 (PST), Phlip
>> wrote:
>>
>> >> What if Santorum won the nomination.
>>
>> >If the far-right is anything it's manipulable. Obama should have as
>> >easy a time getting Santorum nominated as Dick Armey had inventing the
>> >"Tea Party".
>>
>> Well Santorum I don't think can get Moderate vote and has no
>> chance getting Independent votes.
>>
>> I thought Bachmann claims to have started the Tea party.
>>
>> Didn't Dick Armey and Gingrich invent "Contract with Corporations"
>> :-)
>
>Rick's an expert on being in the military and knows combat from
>watching movies. That's why he says that wimminfolk have no place in
>combat 'cause all the guys are going to defend the chicks instead of
>keeping their eye on the ball. Who cares if there are dozens of
>countries that have women in combat roles, including Canada? Once
>Santorum deregulates everything but extends the tentacles of the
>government into the private lives of the people by outlawing same-sex-
>marriage, gays, the right to chose an abortion, birth control and who
>knows? Divorce? We'll all be free!
>
>It will cost a few $billion to install those webcams in everybody's
>bedrooms, but the social consequences avoided by putting them in will
>rival the freedom we gained under the good old days of The Patriot Act
>when Bush was in charge! It's all about Religious freedom! The
>same "Religious Freedom" that British history saw the Puritans as
>representing when they were booted out, as opposed to the US version
>when they arrived and were seeking a way to act like The Taliban!
I'm just glad Santorum hasn't a chance. I've never crossed parties
on a Presidential vote before. Would have to think long and hard if
he was the nominee.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
